U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 7— SOCIAL SECURITY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XVI— SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR AGED, BLIND, AND DISABLED

42 U.S.C. § 1381

Statement of purpose; authorization of appropriations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

For the purpose of establishing a national program to provide supplemental security income to individuals who have attained age 65 or are blind or disabled, there are authorized to be appropriated sums sufficient to carry out this subchapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2,948 cases (1,264 in the last 5 years), 1969–2026 · leading case: Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221 (1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221 (1981). · cites it 6× “1465 , 42 U. S. C. § 1381 et seq. This program was intended "[t]o assist those who cannot work because of age, blindness, or disability," S.”
Vasquez v. Astrue, 572 F.3d 586 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “and Supplemental Security Income benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. Vasquez claims that the Commissioner improperly discounted her symptom reporting, failed to consider evidence of her severe mental impairment, and improperly applied principles of res judicata.”
Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 (1984). · cites it 2× “Under New York law, one who is eligible to receive benefits under the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program, 42 U. S. C. § 1381 et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp.”
Sczepanski v. Saul, 946 F.3d 152 (2d Cir. 2020). · cites it 2× “_______________ KATZMANN, Chief Judge: This case calls upon us to determine whether, in the context of consideration of an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq., the ability to complete a…”
Schweiker v. Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412 (1988). · cites it 2× “A very similar program for disabled indigents is operated under Title XVI of the Act, 42 U. S. C. § 1381 et seq. (1982 ed. and Supp.”
Kandi Cline v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 771 F.3d 1098 (8th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “application for supplemental security income (SSI) under the Social Security Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.”
Talavera v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 697 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2012). “1 BACKGROUND Talavera appeals from the August 10, 2011 judgment of the district court, which affirmed the decision of Defendant-Appellee the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) to deny her December 15, 1999 application for SSI disability benefits pursuant to…”
Paul Scott v. Nancy A. Berryhill, 855 F.3d 853 (8th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 1381 -1383f. Because the decision of the ALJ is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, we affirm.”
Hawkins v. El Paso First Health Plans, Inc., 214 S.W.3d 709 (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 1381 (West 2003), § 1382c(a)(3)(C) (West Supp.”
Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080 (10th Cir. 2007). “§§ 401 (a)-(m) and 42 U.S.C. § 1381 . Lax contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in determining that Lax’s impairment did not meet or medically equal Listing 12.”
Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., 399 F.3d 546 (3rd Cir. 2005). “Joyce Rutherford (“Rutherford”) challenges the denial of her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 -1383f (“Act”). 1 She filed for benefits in June 2000, claiming an onset date of June 23, 1999 and an…”
Tina Popa v. Nancy Berryhill, 872 F.3d 901 (9th Cir. 2017). “I Tina Marie Popa applied for supplemental security income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq., on May 9, 2011.”
Show all 2,948 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.