42 U.S.C. § 16927
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2009–2013 · leading case: State v. Atcitty
State v. Atcitty (2009)
“” 42 U.S.C. § 16927 (a)(2)(C). The Adam Walsh Act further provides that an Indian tribe subject to the Act “is not required to duplicate functions under this part which are fully carried out by another jurisdiction or jurisdictions within which the territory of the tribe is…”
State of Arizona v. Raymond John (2013)
“¶ 4 The term “jurisdiction,” as used in SORNA, includes a state as well as “a federally recognized Indian tribe,” like the Navajo Nation, “[t]o the extent provided and subject to the requirements of’ 42 U.S.C. § 16927 . 42 U.S.C. § 16911 (10)(A), (H); see also United States v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.