42 U.S.C. § 17901

Coordination of Federal activities with adopted standards and implementation specifications

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Spending on health information technology systems

As each agency (as defined by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services) implements, acquires, or upgrades health information technology systems used for the direct exchange of individually identifiable health information between agencies and with non-Federal entities, it shall utilize, where available, health information technology systems and products that meet standards and implementation specifications adopted under section 300jj–14 of this title, as added by section 13101.11 See References in Text note below.

(b) Federal information collection activities

With respect to a standard or implementation specification adopted under section 300jj–14 of this title, as added by section 13101, the President shall take measures to ensure that Federal activities involving the broad collection and submission of health information are consistent with such standard or implementation specification, respectively, within three years after the date of such adoption.

(c) Application of definitions

The definitions contained in section 300jj of this title, as added by section 13101,1 shall apply for purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 111–5, div. A, title XIII, § 13111, Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 242.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Section 13101, referred to in text, means section 13101 of div. A of Pub. L. 111–5.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: Deana Pollard Sacks v. Thomas Hall & Gregory R. Travis (Tex. App. 2014).
Deana Pollard Sacks v. Thomas Hall & Gregory R. Travis (Tex. App. 2014). “115 (codified in 42 U.S.C. §§ 17901–17954). As Sacks points out, HIPAA limits the situations in which a healthcare provider may release a patient’s medical information without the patient’s consent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.