42 U.S.C. § 2039

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; composition; tenure; duties; compensation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

There is established an Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards consisting of a maximum of fifteen members appointed by the Commission for terms of four years each. The Committee shall review safety studies and facility license applications referred to it and shall make reports thereon, shall advise the Commission with regard to the hazards of proposed or existing reactor facilities and the adequacy of proposed reactor safety standards, and shall perform such other duties as the Commission may request. One member shall be designated by the Committee as its Chairman. The members of the Committee shall receive a per diem compensation for each day spent in meetings or conferences, or other work of the Committee, and all members shall receive their necessary traveling or other expenses while engaged in the work of the Committee. The provisions of section 2203 of this title shall be applicable to the Committee.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1971–1983 · leading case: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc., 435 U.S. 519 (1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Nat. Resources Def. Council, Inc., 435 U.S. 519 (1978). · cites it 3× “3 See 42 U. S. C. §§ 2039 , 2232 (b). The Commission staff also undertakes the review required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 83 Stat.”

Union of Concerned Scientists v. Atomic Energy Comm'n & United States of Am., Boston Edison Co., Intervenor, 499 F.2d 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1974). · cites it 2× “579 (1957), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2039 , 2232(b), 2239(a). By 1960 it had become apparent to both the AEC and the Joint Committee that the agency’s regulatory organization and procedures were in need of further refinement to meet problems associated with the combination of regulatory and…”

Aeschliman v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 547 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “As required by 42 U.S.C. §§ 2039 , 2232(b), the application was referred to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards [ACRS], and to the Commission staff.”

N. States Power Co. v. The State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 447 F.2d 1143 (8th Cir. 1971). “, now 42 U.S.C. § 2039 which gives statutory standing to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.”

Nader v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 513 F.2d 1045 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “The Advisory Committee on Nuclear Reactor Safeguards is a body of nongovernmental experts convened for the purpose of advising the Commission on “the hazards of proposed or existing reactor facilities and the adequacy of proposed reactor safety standards.”

Cnty. of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co., 554 F. Supp. 399 (E.D.N.Y 1983). “” 42 U.S.C. § 2039 . 3 . 549 F.Supp. 1250 (E.”

Porter Cnty. Chapter of the Izaak Walton League of Am., Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Comm'n, 380 F. Supp. 630 (N.D. Ind. 1974). “” ( 42 U.S.C. § 2039 ) 21. The Committee is authorized a maximum of 15 members appointed by the Atomic Energy Commission for terms of 4 years each.”

Porter Cnty. Chapter of the Izaak Walton League of Am., Inc. v. Atomic Energy Comm'n, 515 F.2d 513 (7th Cir. 1975). “102(a), and by the 15-member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 2039 and 2232(b). In this case after the filing of 16 amendments by NIPSCO, ACRS filed its safety report on October 14, 1971, pursuant to 42 U.”

Dual Membership of an Individual on Two Fed. Advisory Committees (OLC 1980). “42 U.S.C. §2039 . The question arises whether such compensation consti tutes salary so as to disqualify him for a seat on the Oversight Commit tee.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.