42 U.S.C. § 2703
Repealed. Pub. L. 93–644, § 16(b), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2330
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1971–1979 · leading case: United States v. William Ruffin, 613 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1979).
United States v. William Ruffin, 613 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1979). “, Young Mothers Training Program (YMP) monies that were the subject of federal financing under the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended, all in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2703 . Ruffin was acquitted of a fourth count charging him and Defreitas, YMP’s director, with…”
United States v. Henry W. Cogwell, United States of Am. v. Charles Edward Bey, 486 F.2d 823 (7th Cir. 1973). “by signing the time and attendance sheets of program trainees with the knowledge that they were neither at the training centers nor at job interviews (9 counts), and for misapplying grant funds by endorsing the names of trainees to stipend checks knowing that they received…”
United States v. Freeman, 443 F. Supp. 288 (N.D. Cal. 1977). “3 *289 Counts I and II of the superseding indictment charge that Freeman violated 42 U.S.C. §§ 2703 (a) and 2971f 4 and 18 U.”
United States v. Glenn J. June, 503 F.2d 442 (8th Cir. 1974). “June, after entering a plea of not guilty to two counts of an indictment charging violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2703 (a) and after.having filed written waiver of jury trial, was tried to the court and found guilty on both counts.”
United States v. William L. Riddick & Thomas B. Wallace, 519 F.2d 645 (8th Cir. 1975). “Appellants Riddick and Wallace were tried and convicted on both counts of a two-count indictment for conspiring to violate 42 U.S.C. § 2703 (a) by misapplying and obtaining by fraud monies, funds, assets and property which were the subject of Office of Economic Opportunity…”
United States v. Bailey, 327 F. Supp. 802 (N.D. Ill. 1971). “§ 1001 and 42 U.S.C. § 2703 . These counts primarily concern the alleged making of fraudulent written statements and the forging of signatures.”
United States v. Dale Duane Minyard, 461 F.2d 931 (9th Cir. 1972). “HAMLEY, Circuit Judge: Dale Duane Minyard appeals from his conviction on eight counts 1 of a seventeen-count indictment charging that, on various dates in June and July, 1969, he obtained by fraud, from the individual named in each count, money which was the subject of a grant…”
United States v. Bailey, 332 F. Supp. 1351 (N.D. Ill. 1971). “§ 1001 and 42 U.S.C. § 2703 , by the making of certain allegedly fraudulent written statements and forged instruments.”
United States v. Thomas Edward Hill & Ike Landrum, 495 F.2d 1245 (5th Cir. 1974). “PER CURIAM: Defendants Landrum and Hill were convicted after a jury trial on an eleven-count indictment charging the fraudulent obtaining of funds of an agency which received United States Government financial assistance, all in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2703 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 .…”
United States v. Otto D. Woods, 518 F.2d 696 (8th Cir. 1975). “Convicted of six counts of violating 42 U.S.C. § 2703 (a), making it a crime to fraudulently misapply funds issued under the Economic Opportunity Program, 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.