42 U.S.C. § 3758
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1971–1980 · leading case: Massachusetts Dep't of Corr. v. Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 605 F.2d 21 (1st Cir. 1979).
Massachusetts Dep't of Corr. v. Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 605 F.2d 21 (1st Cir. 1979). “” On June 8, 1977 Hall wrote Campbell to request a hearing on the grant denial under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 3758 (b) and 28 C.F.R. § 18.33 .”
Champaign Cnty., Illinois v. United States Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 611 F.2d 1200 (7th Cir. 1979). “42 U.S.C. § 3758 (b) (1976). The LEAA on June 17, 1977 informed the County that its grant application was being rejected because it was “non-responsive to LEAA Guidelines so as to preclude implementation of the specific projects described in the applications.”
Russell v. Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 637 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1980). “We take jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. §§ 3758 (a), 3759 (1976), and reverse.”
Ely v. Velde, 321 F. Supp. 1088 (E.D. Va. 1971). “and directs that, to the fullest extent possible: (1) the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in this chapter, and (2) all agencies of the Federal Government shall— (C)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.