42 U.S.C. § 3758

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Massachusetts Department of Correction v. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1979) ca1 “” On June 8, 1977 Hall wrote Campbell to request a hearing on the grant denial under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 3758 (b) and 28 C.F.R. § 18.33 .”
Champaign County, Illinois v. United States Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1979) ca7 “42 U.S.C. § 3758 (b) (1976). The LEAA on June 17, 1977 informed the County that its grant application was being rejected because it was “non-responsive to LEAA Guidelines so as to preclude implementation of the specific projects described in the applications.”
Russell v. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1980) ca9 · cites it 2× “We take jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. §§ 3758 (a), 3759 (1976), and reverse.”
Ely v. Velde (1971) vaed “and directs that, to the fullest extent possible: (1) the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in this chapter, and (2) all agencies of the Federal Government shall— (C)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.