42 U.S.C. § 3765

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1985–2018 · leading case: Hyatt v. Commonwealth

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hyatt v. Commonwealth (2002) ky “If a state did not adopt some version of Megan’s Law with certain provisions, Congress could withhold 10 percent of the funds that the state would ordinarily receive under 42 U.S.C. § 3765 , the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.”

Commonwealth v. Thompson (2018) moctapp “As part of the Act, Congress encouraged states to pass sex offender registration statutes, with the explicit threat that failure to do so could result in a ten percent reduction in funding the state would normally receive under 42 U.S.C. § 3765 , the Omnibus Crime Control and…”

Massachusetts Fair Share v. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1985) cadc “LEAA claimed in its brief, Brief for Respondent at 21-22, that under 42 U.S.C. § 3765 (1982) it had residual power to annul the joint decision of LEAA and ACTION in petitioner’s favor.”

Moffitt v. Commonwealth (2012) kyctapp “To ensure compliance, Congress conditioned federal funding on states enacting the requisite registration statutes; states that failed to do so *251 would forfeit ten percent of the funds they would customarily receive under 42 U.S.C. § 3765 , the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe…”

Creekmore v. Attorney General of Texas (2000) txed “The reference to Section 506 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3765 , is now confusing because Congress repealed Section 3765 with the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, Pub.”

Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Kyle D. Thompson (2018) ky “As part of the Act, Congress encouraged states to pass sex offender registration statutes, with the explicit threat that failure to do so could result in a ten percent reduction in funding the state would normally receive under 42 U.S.C. § 3765 , the Om.nibus Crime Control and…”

United States v. Jensen (2008) ca6 “Failure to adopt some version of Megan’s Law with certain provisions would result in Congress withholding ten (10) percent of the funds that the state would ordinarily receive under 42 U.S.C. § 3765 , the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.