U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 46— JUSTICE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER VIII— ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

42 U.S.C. § 3789g

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of McMinn County and McMinn County, Te
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of McMinn County and McMinn County, Te (1996) ca6 · cites it 14× “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Thoma v. Hickel (1997) alaska · cites it 6× “The court relied on the same rationale as Polchowski , reasoning that the underlying statute does not create a privately enforceable right of action, and stating that subsection (b) of 42 U.S.C. § 3789g "imposes compliance obligations only on a federal agency, not upon the…”
Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Com (1999) ca9 “There, the question was whether § 1983 provided a remedy against a state official for allegedly violating 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a), which prohibits governmental entities from disclosing certain statistical information.”
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. First Judicial District Court (1981) nm · cites it 2× “CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW The Attorney General maintains that since his office received a federal grant *337 to supplement the funds appropriated by the Legislature to investigate the riot, that under federal law, 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a) (1976) (Supp. III 1979), he…”
Kent County Board of Education v. Bilbrough (1987) md “Bilbrough asserts that this conduct violated a number of statutes and regulations, including § 524(b) of the Omnibus Crime Con *492 trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968, now codified as 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b), and gives rise to a private cause of action.”
Keaukaha-Panaewa Community Association v. Hawaiian Homes Commission (1984) ca9 “§ 552a, provides exclusive remedy for information disclosure prohibited by Justice Systems Improvement Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3789g); Powell v. Defore, 699 F.”
Brenda Edwards v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation (1987) cadc “42 U.S.C. § 3789g (1982 & Supp. III 1985).”
Central Valley Chapter of 7th Step Foundation, Inc. v. Younger (1989) calctapp “1), without determining the current disposition status or the complete disposition for the arrest or detention does not violate the equal protection, due process, or right of privacy guarantees of the California or federal Constitutions, 42 U.S.C. § 3789g, 28 C.F.R. § 20.1 et…”
Commissioner of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Commission (2013) connappct “2d 422 (1991) (42 U.S.C § 3789g prohibits disclosure of FBI “rap sheets”); see also Ellerbe v.”
Gannett Co. v. Delaware Criminal Justice Information System (1999) delsuperct “” 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b). In 1975, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration issued regulations to carry out this mandate.”
People v. Hodges (1997) nysupct “) But among the many laws and regulations providing for confidentiality of specified portions of court files, none forbids disclosure of a voluntary disclosure form or a notice provided under CPL 710.”
Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States (2004) uscfc “§ 409 (2000) (certain highway safety data "shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages"); 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a) (2000) (certain public health information "shall be…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a) — 5 cases
Thoma v. Hickel (1997) alaska “The court relied on the same rationale as Polchowski , reasoning that the underlying statute does not create a privately enforceable right of action, and stating that subsection (b) of 42 U.S.C. § 3789g "imposes compliance obligations only on a federal agency, not upon the…”
Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Com (1999) ca9 “There, the question was whether § 1983 provided a remedy against a state official for allegedly violating 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a), which prohibits governmental entities from disclosing certain statistical information.”
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. First Judicial District Court (1981) nm “CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW The Attorney General maintains that since his office received a federal grant *337 to supplement the funds appropriated by the Legislature to investigate the riot, that under federal law, 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a) (1976) (Supp. III 1979), he…”
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of McMinn County and McMinn County, Te (1996) ca6 “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States (2004) uscfc “§ 409 (2000) (certain highway safety data "shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages"); 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a) (2000) (certain public health information "shall be…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b) — 5 cases
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of McMinn County and McMinn County, Te (1996) ca6 “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Kent County Board of Education v. Bilbrough (1987) md “Bilbrough asserts that this conduct violated a number of statutes and regulations, including § 524(b) of the Omnibus Crime Con *492 trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968, now codified as 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b), and gives rise to a private cause of action.”
Gannett Co. v. Delaware Criminal Justice Information System (1999) delsuperct “” 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b). In 1975, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration issued regulations to carry out this mandate.”
McCloud, Jr. v. City of New York (2025) nyed
United States Participation in Interpol Computerized Search File Project (1981) olc
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(c) — 2 cases
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of McMinn County and McMinn County, Te (1996) ca6 “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Gill v. Department of Justice (2017) cand
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(d) — 1 case
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of McMinn County and McMinn County, Te (1996) ca6 “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.