U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 46— JUSTICE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER VIII— ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

42 U.S.C. § 3789g

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, 87 F.3d 176 (6th Cir. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, 87 F.3d 176 (6th Cir. 1996). · cites it 14× “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Thoma v. Hickel, 947 P.2d 816 (Alaska 1997). · cites it 6× “The court relied on the same rationale as Polchowski , reasoning that the underlying statute does not create a privately enforceable right of action, and stating that subsection (b) of 42 U.S.C. § 3789g "imposes compliance obligations only on a federal agency, not upon the…”
Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State & Consum. Affairs Agency Med. Bd. of California Acupuncture Comm. & Marilyn Nielsen, 191 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 1999). “There, the question was whether § 1983 provided a remedy against a state official for allegedly violating 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a), which prohibits governmental entities from disclosing certain statistical information.”
State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. First Jud. Dist. Court, 629 P.2d 330 (N.M. 1981). · cites it 2× “CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW The Attorney General maintains that since his office received a federal grant *337 to supplement the funds appropriated by the Legislature to investigate the riot, that under federal law, 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a) (1976) (Supp. III 1979), he…”
Kent Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Bilbrough, 525 A.2d 232 (Md. 1987). “Bilbrough asserts that this conduct violated a number of statutes and regulations, including § 524(b) of the Omnibus Crime Con *492 trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968, now codified as 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b), and gives rise to a private cause of action.”
Keaukaha-Panaewa Cmty. Ass'n v. Hawaiian Homes Comm'n, 739 F.2d 1467 (9th Cir. 1984). “§ 552a, provides exclusive remedy for information disclosure prohibited by Justice Systems Improvement Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3789g); Powell v. Defore, 699 F.”
Brenda Edwards v. Dist. of Columbia, 821 F.2d 651 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “42 U.S.C. § 3789g (1982 & Supp. III 1985).”
Cent. Valley Chapter of 7th Step Found., Inc. v. Younger, 214 Cal. App. 3d 145 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989). “1), without determining the current disposition status or the complete disposition for the arrest or detention does not violate the equal protection, due process, or right of privacy guarantees of the California or federal Constitutions, 42 U.S.C. § 3789g, 28 C.F.R. § 20.1 et…”
Comm'r of Pub. Saf. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 76 A.3d 185 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). “2d 422 (1991) (42 U.S.C § 3789g prohibits disclosure of FBI “rap sheets”); see also Ellerbe v.”
Gannett Co. v. Delaware Crim. Just. Info. Sys., 768 A.2d 508 (Del. Super. Ct. 1999). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b). In 1975, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration issued regulations to carry out this mandate.”
People v. Hodges, 172 Misc. 2d 112 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1997). “) But among the many laws and regulations providing for confidentiality of specified portions of court files, none forbids disclosure of a voluntary disclosure form or a notice provided under CPL 710.”
Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States, 60 Fed. Cl. 611 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “§ 409 (2000) (certain highway safety data "shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages"); 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a) (2000) (certain public health information "shall be…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a): 5 cases
Thoma v. Hickel, 947 P.2d 816 (Alaska 1997). “The court relied on the same rationale as Polchowski , reasoning that the underlying statute does not create a privately enforceable right of action, and stating that subsection (b) of 42 U.S.C. § 3789g "imposes compliance obligations only on a federal agency, not upon the…”
Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State & Consum. Affairs Agency Med. Bd. of California Acupuncture Comm. & Marilyn Nielsen, 191 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 1999). “There, the question was whether § 1983 provided a remedy against a state official for allegedly violating 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a), which prohibits governmental entities from disclosing certain statistical information.”
State ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. First Jud. Dist. Court, 629 P.2d 330 (N.M. 1981). “CONFIDENTIALITY REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW The Attorney General maintains that since his office received a federal grant *337 to supplement the funds appropriated by the Legislature to investigate the riot, that under federal law, 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a) (1976) (Supp. III 1979), he…”
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, 87 F.3d 176 (6th Cir. 1996). “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States, 60 Fed. Cl. 611 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “§ 409 (2000) (certain highway safety data "shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages"); 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(a) (2000) (certain public health information "shall be…”
42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b): 5 cases
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, 87 F.3d 176 (6th Cir. 1996). “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Kent Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Bilbrough, 525 A.2d 232 (Md. 1987). “Bilbrough asserts that this conduct violated a number of statutes and regulations, including § 524(b) of the Omnibus Crime Con *492 trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968, now codified as 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b), and gives rise to a private cause of action.”
Gannett Co. v. Delaware Crim. Just. Info. Sys., 768 A.2d 508 (Del. Super. Ct. 1999). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3789g(b). In 1975, the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration issued regulations to carry out this mandate.”
McCloud, Jr. v. City of New York, No. 1:23-cv-08341 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2025).
United States Participation in Interpol Computerized Search File Proj. (OLC 1981).
42 U.S.C. § 3789g(c): 2 cases
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, 87 F.3d 176 (6th Cir. 1996). “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Gill v. Dep't of Just., 246 F. Supp. 3d 1264 (N.D. Cal. 2017).
42 U.S.C. § 3789g(d): 1 case
Jackie Ray Cline v. George W. Rogers, 87 F.3d 176 (6th Cir. 1996). “The complaint also asserted an implied private right of action under 42 U.S.C. § 3789g. Finally, the complaint alleged “violations of State and federal common law rights to privacy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.