42 U.S.C. § 404
CONSTRUCTION OF TITLE.
“Nothing in this title shall be construed to authorize the Administrator to carry out any regulatory program or any activity other than research, development, and related reporting, information dissemination, and coordination activities specified in this title. Nothing in this title shall be construed to limit the authority of the Administrator or of any other agency or instrumentality of the United States under any other authority of law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 475
cases (91 in the last 5 years), 1948–2026 · leading case: Sullivan v. Everhart
Sullivan v. Everhart (1990)
“" Act §§ 204(a)(1)(A), (B); 42 U. S. C. §§ 404 (a)(1)(A), (B) (1982 ed.”
Mathews v. Eldridge (1976)
“42 U. S. C. § 404 . Cf. § 423 (b); 20 CFR §§ 404.”
Califano v. Yamasaki (1979)
“Respondents in turn have requested reconsideration or waiver of recoupment under § 204 of the Act, 42 U. S. C. § 404 . The primary questions in this case are whether petitioner must grant respondents the opportunity for an oral hearing before recoupment begins, and whether…”
Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (2014)
“” 42 U.S.C. § 404 (a). The statute allows a claimant receiving an adverse decision to obtain administrative review.”
Willie Ousley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (2018)
“See 42 U.S.C. § 404 (b); see also 20 C.F.R. §§ 404 .”
John M. Valley v. Commissioner of Social Security (2005)
“” 42 U.S.C. § 404 (b). The ALJ found that denying Valley’s waiver request would neither defeat the purpose of Title II nor violate equity and good conscience.”
Carley Cunningham v. Commissioner of Social Security (2010)
“42 U.S.C. § 404 (d)(7); 20 C.F.R. § 404.503 (b)(7).”
Action Alliance of Senior Citizens v. Johnson (2009)
“Internal SSA policy guidelines, in the form of its Program Operations Manual System (“POMS”), create such a right on the basis of Title II’s general waiver provision, 42 U.S.C. § 404 (b). Action Alliance I, 456 F.”
Grice v. Colvin (2015)
“See 42 U.S.C. § 404 (a)(1). In 2009, the Treasury revised its regulation to eliminate the ten-year limitation for collecting debts through tax offsets.”
Binder & Binder, P.C. v. Astrue (2012)
“”) As set forth more fully below, 42 U.S.C. § 404 (a) requires the SSA, not plaintiff, to seek to recoup any overpayment of a past-due benefits award from the claimant.”
Skrodzki v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (2017)
“42 U.S.C. § 404 (a)(1)(A). An overpayment is one that is in excess of what the individual is entitled to receive.”
Paul Miskey v. Kilolo Kijakazi (2022)
“” 42 U.S.C. § 404 (b)(1). COUNSEL Richard E.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 404(b) — 6 cases
Sayler v. Weinberger (1974)
Lindsay v. Richardson (1973)
Jaxson v. Saul (2019)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.