42 U.S.C. § 404

CONSTRUCTION OF TITLE.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

“Nothing in this title shall be construed to authorize the Administrator to carry out any regulatory program or any activity other than research, development, and related reporting, information dissemination, and coordination activities specified in this title. Nothing in this title shall be construed to limit the authority of the Administrator or of any other agency or instrumentality of the United States under any other authority of law.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 475 cases (91 in the last 5 years), 1948–2026 · leading case: Sullivan v. Everhart, 494 U.S. 83 (1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sullivan v. Everhart, 494 U.S. 83 (1990). · cites it 22× “" Act §§ 204(a)(1)(A), (B); 42 U. S. C. §§ 404 (a)(1)(A), (B) (1982 ed.”

Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976). · cites it 6× “42 U. S. C. § 404 . Cf. § 423 (b); 20 CFR §§ 404.”

Califano v. Yamasaki, 442 U.S. 682 (1979). · cites it 6× “Respondents in turn have requested reconsideration or waiver of recoupment under § 204 of the Act, 42 U. S. C. § 404 . The primary questions in this case are whether petitioner must grant respondents the opportunity for an oral hearing before recoupment begins, and whether…”

Treichler v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 775 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “” 42 U.S.C. § 404 (a). The statute allows a claimant receiving an adverse decision to obtain administrative review.”

Willie Ousley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 909 F.3d 786 (6th Cir. 2018). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 404 (b); see also 20 C.F.R. §§ 404 .”

John M. Valley v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 427 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 2005). · cites it 4× “” 42 U.S.C. § 404 (b). The ALJ found that denying Valley’s waiver request would neither defeat the purpose of Title II nor violate equity and good conscience.”

Carley Cunningham v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 360 F. App'x 606 (6th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “42 U.S.C. § 404 (d)(7); 20 C.F.R. § 404.503 (b)(7).”

Action All. of Senior Citizens v. Johnson, 607 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2009). · cites it 12× “Internal SSA policy guidelines, in the form of its Program Operations Manual System (“POMS”), create such a right on the basis of Title II’s general waiver provision, 42 U.S.C. § 404 (b). Action Alliance I, 456 F.”

Grice v. Colvin, 97 F. Supp. 3d 684 (D. Maryland 2015). · cites it 12× “See 42 U.S.C. § 404 (a)(1). In 2009, the Treasury revised its regulation to eliminate the ten-year limitation for collecting debts through tax offsets.”

Binder & Binder, P.C. v. Astrue, 848 F. Supp. 2d 230 (E.D.N.Y 2012). · cites it 17× “”) As set forth more fully below, 42 U.S.C. § 404 (a) requires the SSA, not plaintiff, to seek to recoup any overpayment of a past-due benefits award from the claimant.”

Skrodzki v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., 693 F. App'x 29 (2d Cir. 2017). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 404 (a)(1)(A). An overpayment is one that is in excess of what the individual is entitled to receive.”

Paul Miskey v. Kilolo Kijakazi, 33 F.4th 565 (9th Cir. 2022). · cites it 4× “” 42 U.S.C. § 404 (b)(1). COUNSEL Richard E.”

Show all 475 citing cases →

— 42 U.S.C. § 404(b) — 6 cases

Bernie DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 840 F.2d 822 (11th Cir. 1988).

Sayler v. Weinberger, 377 F. Supp. 788 (E.D. Mich. 1974).

Lindsay v. Richardson, 357 F. Supp. 203 (W.D.N.C. 1973).

Jaxson v. Saul (N.D. Ill. 2019).

Zentner (N.D. Ohio 2025).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.