U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 7— SOCIAL SECURITY › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV— GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD-WELFARE SERVICES › Part Part A— Block Grants to States for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

42 U.S.C. § 606

Federal loans for State welfare programs

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Loan authority(1) In general

The Secretary shall make loans to any loan-eligible State, for a period to maturity of not more than 3 years.

(2) Loan-eligible State

As used in paragraph (1), the term “loan-eligible State” means a State against which a penalty has not been imposed under section 609(a)(1) of this title.

(b) Rate of interest

The Secretary shall charge and collect interest on any loan made under this section at a rate equal to the current average market yield on outstanding marketable obligations of the United States with remaining periods to maturity comparable to the period to maturity of the loan.

(c) Use of loanA State shall use a loan made to the State under this section only for any purpose for which grant amounts received by the State under section 603(a) of this title may be used, including—(1) welfare anti-fraud activities; and(2) the provision of assistance under the State program to Indian families that have moved from the service area of an Indian tribe with a tribal family assistance plan approved under section 612 of this title.(d) Limitation on total amount of loans to State

The cumulative dollar amount of all loans made to a State under this section during fiscal years 1997 through 2003 shall not exceed 10 percent of the State family assistance grant.

(e) Limitation on total amount of outstanding loans

The total dollar amount of loans outstanding under this section may not exceed $1,700,000,000.

(f) Appropriation

Out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are appropriated such sums as may be necessary for the cost of loans under this section.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title IV, § 406, as added Pub. L. 104–193, title I, § 103(a)(1), Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2128; amended Pub. L. 105–33, title V, § 5514(c), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 620; Pub. L. 108–40, § 3(f), June 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 837.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 606, acts Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title IV, § 406, 49 Stat. 629; Aug. 10, 1939, ch. 666, title IV, § 403, 53 Stat. 1380; Aug. 28, 1950, ch. 809, title III, pt. 2, § 323(a), 64 Stat. 551; Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 836, title III, §§ 321, 322, 351(b), 70 Stat. 850, 855; July 25, 1962, Pub. L. 87–543, title I, §§ 104(a)(3)(D), 108(a), 109, 152, 156(b), 76 Stat. 185, 189, 190, 206, 207; Oct. 13, 1964, Pub. L. 88–641, § 2(a), 78 Stat. 1042; July 30, 1965, Pub. L. 89–97, title IV, § 409, 79 Stat. 422; Jan. 2, 1968, Pub. L. 90–248, title II, §§ 201(f), 206(b), 207(a), 241(b)(5), 81 Stat. 880, 893, 916; Jan. 4, 1975, Pub. L. 93–647, §§ 3(a)(5), 101(c)(7), 88 Stat. 2348, 2360; Nov. 12, 1977, Pub. L. 95–171, § 3(a)(2), 91 Stat. 1354; Dec. 28, 1980, Pub. L. 96–611, § 4, 94 Stat. 3567; Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, title XXI, § 2184(b)(2), title XXIII, §§ 2311, 2312, 2317(b), 2353(b)(1), 95 Stat. 817, 852, 853, 856, 872; Sept. 3, 1982, Pub. L. 97–248, title I, § 153(a), 96 Stat. 396; July 18, 1984, Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title III, § 2361(c), title VI, § 2663(c)(3)(A), (B)(i), 98 Stat. 1104, 1166; Aug. 16, 1984, Pub. L. 98–378, § 20(a), 98 Stat. 1322, related to definitions used in this part, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–193, § 103(a)(1), as amended by Pub. L. 105–33, title V, § 5514(c), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 620.

Amendments

2003—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 108–40 substituted “2003” for “2002”.

1997—Pub. L. 105–33 made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 104–193, § 103(a)(1), which enacted this section.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2003 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–40 effective July 1, 2003, see section 8 of Pub. L. 108–40, set out as a note under section 603 of this title.

Effective Date of 1997 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–33 effective as if included in the provision of Pub. L. 104–193 amended at the time the provision became law, see section 5518(d) of Pub. L. 105–33, set out as a note under section 862a of Title 21, Food and Drugs.

Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1997, with transition rules relating to State options to accelerate such date, rules relating to claims, actions, and proceedings commenced before such date, rules relating to closing out of accounts for terminated or substantially modified programs and continuance in office of Assistant Secretary for Family Support, and provisions relating to termination of entitlement under AFDC program, see section 116 of Pub. L. 104–193, as amended, set out as a note under section 601 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 379 cases, 1961–2019 · leading case: Dandridge v. Williams
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dandridge v. Williams (1970) scotus · cites it 16× “42 U. S. C. § 606 (b) (1964 ed., Supp. IV).”
King v. Smith (1968) scotus · cites it 18× “629 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 606 (a) (1964 ed., Supp. II), as an age-qualified [6] "needy child .”
Bacon v. Toia (1977) nysd · cites it 20× “As explained more fully below, NYSSL § 350-j establishes state eligibility requirements for emergency assistance grants disbursed pursuant to federal emergency assistance legislation, 42 U.S.C. § 606 (e). As a result of the 1977 amendment, § 350-j now automatically denies…”
Califano v. Westcott (1979) scotus · cites it 8× “42 U. S. C. § 606 . In 1961, and again in 1962, Congress temporarily extended the AFDC program to provide assistance to families whose dependent children were deprived of support because of a parent's unemployment.”
Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization (1979) scotus · cites it 4× “893 ; see 42 U. S. C. § 606 (e) (1). The program is fully described in Quern v.”
Van Lare v. Hurley (1975) scotus · cites it 10× “42 U. S. C. § 606 (a). States that seek to qualify for federal AFDC funding must operate a program not in conflict with the Social Security Act.”
Quern v. Mandley (1978) scotus · cites it 5× “” 42 U. S. C. § 606 (e)(1). Thus under the EA statute, federal matching funds are available for emergency aid to intact families with children if threatened with destitution, regardless of the cause of their need.”
Darces v. Woods (1984) cal · cites it 6× “[9] ( 42 U.S.C. § 606 (a)(1); Welf. & Inst. Code, § 11250.”
Schweiker v. Gray Panthers (1981) scotus · cites it 2× “338 (1975) (Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) calculations under 42 U. S. C. § 606 (a)); Shea v. Vialpando, 416 U.”
Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Molyneaux (1982) pa · cites it 8× “t with a regulatory presumption on the issue of need that the income of legally responsible relatives is available to dependent children in situations where the children are deprived of parental support and care by reason of either the absence or the disability of the parent,…”
Hale v. State (1981) me · cites it 13× “If plaintiff is found to satisfy the definitional requirements for AFDC eligibility established by 42 U.S.C. § 606 (a) and (b), she is eligible for medicaid benefits by reason of 42 U.”
Venus Mandley v. James L. Trainor (1975) ca7 · cites it 12× “Plaintiffs alleged that the Department’s revised program for emergency assistance to AFDC recipients violated Section 406(e) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. § 606 (e)), regulations promulgated thereunder by HEW, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and…”
Show all 379 citing cases →
— 42 U.S.C. § 606(a) — 9 cases
Wilson v. Weaver (1973) ilnd
Doe v. Schmidt (1971) wied
Gaither v. Sterrett (1972) innd
Zobe v. Burson (1971) gand
Murrow v. Clifford (1974) ca3
— 42 U.S.C. § 606(a)(1) — 2 cases
Hansen v. Department of Social Services (1987) calctapp
Williams v. Wohlgemuth (1975) paed
— 42 U.S.C. § 606(a)(2)(B) — 1 case
Parks v. Harden (1973) gand
— 42 U.S.C. § 606(b) — 1 case
Williams v. Dandridge (1969) mdd
— 42 U.S.C. § 606(b)(2) — 1 case
In Re Callie Jean Hammonds, Debtor. In Re Frances Collins, Debtor. Bibb County Department of Family & Children Services (1984) ca11
— 42 U.S.C. § 606(e) — 1 case
Williams v. Wohlgemuth (1975) paed
— 42 U.S.C. § 606(f) — 1 case
Perillo v. Commonwealth (1978) pa
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.