42 U.S.C. § 9

CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)Consultation.—In carrying out the provisions of this Act, the Secretary shall consult with the heads of other Federal agencies, including the Secretary of the Army, which have experience in conducting desalination research or operating desalination facilities.“(b)Coordination of Federal Desalination Research and Development.—The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy shall develop a coordinated strategic plan that—“(1) establishes priorities for future Federal investments in desalination;“(2) coordinates the activities of Federal agencies involved in desalination, including the Bureau of Reclamation, the Corps of Engineers, the United States Army Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center, the National Science Foundation, the Office of Naval Research of the Department of Defense, the National Laboratories of the Department of Energy, the United States Geological Survey, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;“(3) strengthens research and development cooperation with international partners, such as the State of Israel, in the area of desalination technology; and“(4) promotes public-private partnerships to develop a framework for assessing needs for, and to optimize siting and design of, future ocean desalination projects.“(c)Other Desalination Programs.—The authorization provided for in this Act shall not prohibit other agencies from carrying out separately authorized programs for desalination research or operations.”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2023 · leading case: Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Rohm & Haas Co. v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co., Rohm & Haas Co., 89 F.3d 154 (3rd Cir. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Rohm & Haas Co. v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co., Rohm & Haas Co., 89 F.3d 154 (3rd Cir. 1996). “Section 107(e)(1) provides: No indemnification, hold harmless, or similar agreement or conveyance shall be effective to transfer from the owner or operator of any vessel or facifity or from any person who may be liable for a release or threat of release under this section, to…”

California Dep't of Toxic Substances Control v. Interstate Non-Ferrous Corp., 298 F. Supp. 2d 930 (E.D. Cal. 2003). “y costs of response incurred by any other person consistent with the national contingency plan; (C) damages for injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources, including the reasonable costs of assessing such injury, destruction, or loss resulting from such a release;…”

Duval Ranching Co. v. Glickman, 965 F. Supp. 1427 (D. Nev. 1997). “violated Plaintiffs’ due process rights by failing to solicit Plaintiffs’ input prior to interfering with their property rights.”

Zenteno v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin. (N.D. Tex. 2023). “42 U.S.C. §9 423(d), 1382c(a)(3)(A); McQueen v.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.