Notes of Decisions
Ctr. for Sustainable Econ. v. Sally Jewell, 779 F.3d 588 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
· cites it 4× “629 (1978) codified at 43 U.S.C. § 1802 (1)-(2)). 7 The Amendment transformed OCSLA from “essentially a carte blanche delegation of authority to the Secretary of Interior,” Watt I, 668 F.”
City of New York v. Chevron Corp., 993 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2021).
“at 427; 43 U.S.C. § 1802 (1) (acknowledging the regulatory 10 goal of promoting oil resource management policies “to achieve national economic 11 and energy policy goals, assure national security, reduce dependence on foreign 12 sources, and maintain a favorable balance of…”
Vill. of False Pass v. Watt, 565 F. Supp. 1123 (D. Alaska 1983).
· cites it 2× “43 U.S.C. § 1802 . In order to accomplish these goals, the act provides for an intricate combination of studies, reports, consultations, permits, plans, and licenses covering every aspect of the leasing and development process and involving federal, state, and local governments…”
Michigan Citizens for an Indep. Press v. Richard Thornburgh, 868 F.2d 1285 (D.C. Cir. 1989).
“” This view, however, seems to rely on the notion of a "deep pocket” supporting the paper, which is an impermissible consideration under the NPA, 43 U.S.C. § 1802 (5), but see dissent at 2, and furthermore irrelevant in light of basic principles of economics.”
State of Tex. v. Sec'y of Interior, 580 F. Supp. 1197 (E.D. Tex. 1984).
· cites it 3× “creation of an oil spill liability fund to facilitate prompt cleanup of oil spills attributable to OCS activity and to pay for damages to public or private interests; g.”
Conservation Law Found. v. Watt, 560 F. Supp. 561 (D. Mass. 1983).
· cites it 2× “§ 1801 (14); and the Secretary is required “to balance orderly energy resource development with protection of the human, marine, and coastal environments,” 43 U.S.C. § 1802 (2)(B). In his comments on proposed Lease Sale 52, the Governor made recommendations substantially…”
W. Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Sonoma Cnty., 905 F.2d 1287 (9th Cir. 1990).
· cites it 2× “See 43 U.S.C. § 1802 . The district court dismissed appellants’ claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) because the claims were not ripe and appellants had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies, and under Rule 12(b)(6) because appellants had failed to…”
43 U.S.C. § 1802(1): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.