Each and every grant of right of way and station grounds made prior to February 25, 1909, to any railroad corporation under sections 934 to 939 of this title, where such railroad had not been constructed and the period of five years next following the location of said road, or any section thereof, had on that date expired, is declared forfeited to the United States, to the extent of any portion of such located line then remaining unconstructed, and the United States resumes the full title to the lands covered thereby free and discharged from such easement, and the forfeiture declared shall, without need of further assurance or conveyance, inure to the benefit of any owner or owners of land conveyed by the United States prior to such date subject to any such grant of right of way or station grounds: Provided, That no right of way on which construction was progressing in good faith on February 25, 1909, shall be in any wise affected, validated, or invalidated, by the provisions of this section.
Notes of Decisions
Marvin M. Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States (2014)
scotus · cites it 2×
“43 U. S. C. §940 . The United States would “resume[ ] the full title to the lands covered thereby free and discharged of such easement,” but the forfeited right of way would im mediately “inure to the benefit of any owner or owners of land conveyed by the United States prior to…”
Hash v. United States (2005)
cafc · cites it 2×
“Both sides say that their positions are supported by statutes enacted in 1906 and 1909 to deal with discontinued rights-of-way, when some of the underlying lands had remained public lands and some had been patented to private persons: Thus 43 U.S.C. § 940 stated that the…”
MacDonald v. United States (1941)
ca9 · cites it 2×
“482 , 43 U.S.C.A. § 940 , is of some value in the interpretation of the 1875 grant.”
Samuel C. Johnson 1988 Trust v. Bayfield County (2011)
ca7
“482 , codified at 43 U.S.C. § 940 . And as we noted earlier, the termination of an easement restores to the owner of the fee simple full rights over the part of his land formerly occupied by the right of way created by the easement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.