45 U.S.C. § 201
The claims of individuals who, prior to the effective date of title I of this Act [see Effective Date note set out above], became eligible for annuities, supplemental annuities, or death benefits under section 2, 3(j), or 5 of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937 [section 228b, 228c(j), or 228e of this title] shall be adjudicated by the Board under that Act [subchapter III of this chapter] in the same manner and with the same effect as if title I of this Act [enacting this subchapter] had not been enacted: Provided, however, That no annuity, supplemental annuity, or death benefit shall be awarded under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937 [subchapter III of this chapter] on the basis of an application therefor filed with the Board on or after the effective date of title I of this Act: Provided, further, That no annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1935 [subchapter II of this chapter], no annuity or supplemental annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937 [subchapter III of this chapter], and no pension under section 6 of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937 [section 228f of this title] shall be payable for any month after December 31, 1974 .
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1941–2014 · leading case: Parker v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Parker v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2000)
“Before 1985, Metro-North employees were entitled only to those benefits provided under the federal Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Effective January 1, 1985, Metro-North established the Metro-North Commuter Railroad Defined Contribution Pension Plan for…”
Crowther v. Consolidated Rail Corp. (2012)
“In this appeal, Crowther assigns error to granting the defendants judgment as a matter of law (rejecting the neck and knee claims as untimely and the remaining claims insofar as they rested on alleged failures to perform ergonomic analyses of Crowther’s activities or provide…”
McComb v. Southern Weighing & Inspection Bureau (1948)
“As you know, they have the Adamson Hours of Service Act, the Railroad Labor Act with its Mediation and Arbitration Boards, and they have the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.”
Keele v. Union Pac. R. Co. (1948)
“As you know, they have the Adamson Hours of Service Act, the Railroad Labor Act with its Mediation and Arbitration Boards, and they have the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Therefore there is sufficient precedent for the committee to accept the amendment of…”
Hunter v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. (1948)
“the said Order and Award will deny the plaintiff porter brakemen their property rights to continue to work at the will of the Carrier defendant and perform the services which they have been performing since 1899, and plaintiffs will suffer loss of their seniority rights and will…”
Miller v. Howe Sound Min. Co. (1948)
“The Court, after careful and thorough analysis of the statute and the facts and circumstances, claimed to justify its enactment, came to the conclusion that Congress had acted arbitrarily and that some of its provisions did not have a reasonable relation to its main and…”
Allen v. Ocean S. S. Co. of Savannah (1941)
“435 , 45 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.; 26 U.S.C.A.Int.”
Rubin v. Chicago South Shore & South Bend Railroad (1954)
“45 U.S.C.A. § 201 (a). . 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.”
Mitchell v. Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad (1960)
“Ever since its new incorporation in 1935 the Company has filed annual reports with the Interstate Commerce Commission for all its employees and has paid the required assessments for them under the Railway Retirement Act ( 45 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.) and also under the Railroad…”
Ortíz-Lebrón v. United States (2014)
“First and foremost, they deal directly with the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. a “collateral social insurance benefit” Eichel, 375 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.