45 U.S.C. § 201 to 208
Omitted
45 U.S.C. § 201 has no page of its own: the Office of the Law Revision Counsel prints it together with other sections as the single entry 45 U.S.C. § 201 to 208, shown below.
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1941–2014 · leading case: Parker v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 97 F. Supp. 2d 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).
Parker v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 97 F. Supp. 2d 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). “Before 1985, Metro-North employees were entitled only to those benefits provided under the federal Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Effective January 1, 1985, Metro-North established the Metro-North Commuter Railroad Defined Contribution Pension Plan for…”
Crowther v. Consol. Rail Corp., 680 F.3d 95 (1st Cir. 2012). “In this appeal, Crowther assigns error to granting the defendants judgment as a matter of law (rejecting the neck and knee claims as untimely and the remaining claims insofar as they rested on alleged failures to perform ergonomic analyses of Crowther’s activities or provide…”
McComb v. S. Weighing & Inspection Bureau, 170 F.2d 526 (4th Cir. 1948). “As you know, they have the Adamson Hours of Service Act, the Railroad Labor Act with its Mediation and Arbitration Boards, and they have the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.”
Keele v. Union Pac. R. Co., 78 F. Supp. 678 (S.D. Cal. 1948). “As you know, they have the Adamson Hours of Service Act, the Railroad Labor Act with its Mediation and Arbitration Boards, and they have the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. Therefore there is sufficient precedent for the committee to accept the amendment of…”
Hunter v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 78 F. Supp. 984 (N.D. Ill. 1948). “the said Order and Award will deny the plaintiff porter brakemen their property rights to continue to work at the will of the Carrier defendant and perform the services which they have been performing since 1899, and plaintiffs will suffer loss of their seniority rights and will…”
Miller v. Howe Sound Min. Co., 77 F. Supp. 540 (E.D. Wash. 1948). “The Court, after careful and thorough analysis of the statute and the facts and circumstances, claimed to justify its enactment, came to the conclusion that Congress had acted arbitrarily and that some of its provisions did not have a reasonable relation to its main and…”
Allen v. Ocean S. S. Co. of Savannah, 123 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1941). “435 , 45 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.; 26 U.S.C.A.Int.”
Rubin v. Chicago South Shore & South Bend R.R., 217 F.2d 177 (7th Cir. 1954). “45 U.S.C.A. § 201 (a). . 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.”
Mitchell v. Baltimore & Annapolis R.R., 183 F. Supp. 61 (D. Md. 1960). “Ever since its new incorporation in 1935 the Company has filed annual reports with the Interstate Commerce Commission for all its employees and has paid the required assessments for them under the Railway Retirement Act ( 45 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.) and also under the Railroad…”
Ortíz-Lebrón v. United States, 65 F. Supp. 3d 305 (D.P.R. 2014). “First and foremost, they deal directly with the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. a “collateral social insurance benefit” Eichel, 375 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.