U.S. Code » Title 46 » Subtitle Subtitle III— Maritime Liability › Chapter CHAPTER 301— GENERAL LIABILITY PROVISIONS

46 U.S.C. § 30103

Liability of master, mate, engineer, and pilot

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 46 CasesGoogle Scholar
A person may bring a civil action against a master, mate, engineer, or pilot of a vessel, and recover damages, for personal injury or loss caused by the master’s, mate’s, engineer’s, or pilot’s—(1) negligence or willful misconduct; or(2) neglect or refusal to obey the laws governing the navigation of vessels.(Pub. L. 109–304, § 6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1510.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

30103

46 App.:491 (words after semicolon).

R.S. § 4493 (words after semicolon).

Before paragraph (1), the words “bring a civil action” are substituted for “sue” for consistency with rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.). In paragraph (1), the word “carelessness” is omitted as included in “negligence”.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2024 · leading case: Ramirez v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd., 991 F. Supp. 2d 1187 (S.D. Fla. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ramirez v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd., 991 F. Supp. 2d 1187 (S.D. Fla. 2013). “) Plaintiff filed a four-count Complaint in Florida state court alleging: (I) Jones Act negligence pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 30103 ; (II) unseaworthiness; (III) failure to provide prompt and adequate medical care; and (IV) failure to provide maintenance and care.”
Associated Grain Terminals, LLC v. Harrison, No. 2:19-cv-11898 (E.D. La. Feb. 14, 2020). ““A case is properly dismissed for lack of subject matter 1 46 U.S.C. § 30103 et. seq. 2 33 U.S.C. § 901 et.”
Core Grp. Resources L L C v. Barfield, No. 1:23-cv-01000 (W.D. La. Aug. 15, 2024). “Core Group seeks to have Barfield found to not be a seaman and not entitled to relief under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30103 , et seq., or under general maritime law, including entitlement to maintenance and cure.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.