5 U.S.C. § 602
Regulatory agenda
Section effective
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1985–2015 · leading case: Parkdale International, Ltd. v. United States
Parkdale International, Ltd. v. United States (2007)
“Plaintiffs also argue that in publishing a new legislative rule, an agency is required to state whether the rule complies with various statutes and executive orders, including the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 602 , and Executive Order Number 12,866.”
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2015)
“- at 342-43 (AR3339-40); see also Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 602 (a)(1) (describing agency reporting requirements for rules that are “likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities”).”
Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Chao (2002)
“It explains that under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 602 , agencies must publish regulatory agendas that include all rules the agency intends to propose or promulgate that are “likely to have a significant economic impact on a substan *152 tial number of small…”
Mid-Tex Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1985)
“” 5 U.S.C. § 602 (a)(1) (emphasis added). Since the RFA does not distinguish between the direct “impact” of a regulation on regulated small entities and the indirect “impact” of a regulation on small entities that do business with or are otherwise dependent on the regulated…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.