U.S. Code » Title 5 » Part PART I— THE AGENCIES GENERALLY › Chapter CHAPTER 6— THE ANALYSIS OF REGULATORY FUNCTIONS

5 U.S.C. § 606

Effect on other law

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 5 CasesGoogle Scholar

The requirements of sections 603 and 604 of this title do not alter in any manner standards otherwise applicable by law to agency action.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2021 · leading case: Nat'l Coalition for Marine Conservation v. Evans, 231 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D.D.C. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Coalition for Marine Conservation v. Evans, 231 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D.D.C. 2002). · cites it 2× “” 5 U.S.C. § 606 . The standard of review is the same as that under the APA, in that a court reviews the FRFA for arbitrary and capricious action.”
North Carolina Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. Gutierrez, 518 F. Supp. 2d 62 (D.D.C. 2007). “2003); see also 5 U.S.C. § 606 (“The requirements of [ 5 U.”
Nat'l Ass'n of Mortg. Brokers v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 773 F. Supp. 2d 151 (D.D.C. 2011). “” 5 U.S.C. § 606 . “[T]he Act’s requirements are ‘purely procedural’ [and] though it directs agencies to state, summarize, and describe, the Act in and of itself imposes no substantive constraint on agency decisionmaking.”
Recreational Fishing All. v. Evans, 172 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D.D.C. 2001). “” 5 U.S.C. § 606 . The standard of review is the same as that under the APA — a court reviews the FRFA for arbitrary and capricious action.”
Blue Water Fisherman's Ass'n v. Mineta, 122 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D.D.C. 2000). · cites it 2× “” 5 U.S.C. § 606 . The standard of review is the same as that under the APA — a court reviews the FRFA for arbitrary and capricious action.”
Silver v. Internal Revenue Serv. (D.D.C. 2021). “2003)); see also 5 U.S.C. § 606 (“The requirements of [5 U.”
Nat'l Ass'n of Mortg. Brokers v. Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys. (D.D.C. 2011). “” 5 U.S.C. § 606 . “[T]he Act’s requirements are ‘purely procedural’ [and] though it directs agencies to state, summarize, and describe, the Act in and of itself imposes no substantive constraint on agency decisionmaking.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.