7 U.S.C. § 455
Dissemination of crop, market, etc., information by cooperative marketing associations
Persons engaged, as original producers of agricultural products, such as farmers, planters, ranchmen, dairymen, nut or fruit growers, acting together in associations, corporate or otherwise, in collectively processing, preparing for market, handling, and marketing in interstate and/or foreign commerce such products of persons so engaged, may acquire, exchange, interpret, and disseminate past, present, and prospective crop, market, statistical, economic, and other similar information by direct exchange between such persons, and/or such associations or federations thereof, and/or by and through a common agent created or selected by them.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1956–2022 · leading case: In re Fresh & Process Potatoes Antitrust Litig., 834 F. Supp. 2d 1141 (D. Idaho 2011).
In re Fresh & Process Potatoes Antitrust Litig., 834 F. Supp. 2d 1141 (D. Idaho 2011). “Finally, the Court rejects Potandon’s argument that the Co-operative Marketing Act (“CMA”), 7 U.S.C. § 455 , provides it with a separate and distinct form of immunity.”
N. California Supermarkets, Inc. v. Cent. California Lettuce Producers Coop., 413 F. Supp. 984 (N.D. Cal. 1976). “§§ 291-292 ) (CapperVolstead), and/or Section 5 of the Cooperative Marketing Act of 1926 ( 7 U.S.C. § 455 ) (Section 5). For the reasons hereinafter stated, I hold that Section 6 and CapperVolstead, and each of them, exempt the activities of defendants challenged in this…”
Agritronics Corp. v. Nat'l Dairy Herd Ass'n, 914 F. Supp. 814 (N.D.N.Y. 1996). “7 U.S.C. § 455 . As this Court determined in its Memorandum-Decision and Order (“MDO”) issued on September 22, 1994, an agricultural cooperative must satisfy two requirements in order to be shielded by the Cap-per-Volstead Act from antitrust liability.”
United States v. Maryland Coop. Milk Producers, Inc., 145 F. Supp. 151 (D.D.C. 1956). “In 1926, these provisions were further fortified by the Co-operative Marketing Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 455 , which provides as follows: “Persons engaged, as original producers of agricultural products, nut or fruit growers, ranchmen, dairymen,'such as.”
Treasure Valley Potato Bargaining Ass'n v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc., 497 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1974). “803 , 7 U.S.C. § 455 , 8 lends support to this interpretation.”
Hayes v. Blakeman (W.D. Wash. 2022). “28 7 U.S.C. § 455 (b)(1). Pursuant to 28 U.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.