7 U.S.C. § 6994
Notice and opportunity for hearing
Not later than 10 working days after an adverse decision is made that affects the participant, the Secretary shall provide the participant with written notice of such adverse decision and the rights available to the participant under this subchapter or other law for the review of such adverse decision.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1996–2019 · leading case: St. Bernard Par. Gov't v. United States, 916 F.3d 987 (Fed. Cir. 2019).
St. Bernard Par. Gov't v. United States, 916 F.3d 987 (Fed. Cir. 2019). “at the exhaustion of administrative remedies was not required in this case for three reasons: (1) because the government waived the exhaustion issue by not raising it before the Court of Federal Claims; (2) because the NRCS never issued an adverse decision from which an…”
Aageson Grain & Cattle v. United States Dep't of Agric., 500 F.3d 1038 (9th Cir. 2007). “” 7 U.S.C. § 6994 . Section 6996 states that “a participant shall have the right to appeal an adverse decision to the Division for an evidentiary hearing by a hearing officer consistent with section 6997 of this title.”
Kuster v. Veneman, 226 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (D.N.D. 2002). “Relatedly, plaintiffs seek to amend their complaint to add a claim under 7 U.S.C. § 6994 (doc. # 35). This section requires that participants who receive an adverse decision be provided notice of their rights with the National Appeals Division (“NAD”).”
McBride Cotton & Cattle Corp. v. Veneman, 290 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. 2002). “The Secretary is required by 7 U.S.C. § 6994 to give written notice to farm program participants of an adverse decision and of available administrative review rights.”
Lewis v. Glickman, 104 F. Supp. 2d 1311 (D. Kan. 2000). “See 7 U.S.C. § 6994 (requiring the Secretary to provide the participant with written notice “not later than 10 working days after an adverse decision is made that affects the participant”).”
Chamblee v. Espy, 100 F.3d 15 (4th Cir. 1996). “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 6994 , 6996. 4 . On the merits of the underlying controversy, FmHA contends that, under the regulations applicable at the time, it was required to pursue collection from Mr.”
Mitchell v. Johanns, 400 F. Supp. 2d 1133 (S.D. Iowa 2005). “The Bateman plaintiffs challenged the decision on the basis that the FSA had violated 7 U.S.C. § 6994 , which provides: “Not later than 10 working days after an adverse decision is made that affects the participant, the Secretary shall provide the participant with written notice…”
Bateman Co. v. United States Dep't of Agric., 123 F. Supp. 2d 625 (M.D. Ga. 2000). “” 7 U.S.C.A. § 6994 . There does not seem to be any precedent from the Supreme Court or Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in which this specific statute has been interpreted as a traditional type of statute of limitation.”
Aageson Grain v. United States Dep't of Agric. (9th Cir. 2007). “” 7 U.S.C. § 6994 . Section 6996 states that “a participant shall have the right to appeal an adverse decision to the Division for an evi- dentiary hearing by a hearing officer consistent with section 6997 of this title.”
Prod. Mktg., L.L.C. v. Commodity Credit Corp., 108 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (M.D. Ala. 2000). “See 7 U.S.C. § 6994 . Section 6996 discusses appeals to the Division for a hearing and the time requirements for such.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.