U.S. Code » Title 7 » Chapter CHAPTER 48— HUMANE METHODS OF LIVESTOCK SLAUGHTER

7 U.S.C. § 902

DEFINITIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar
“In this subtitle:“(1)Commercial transportation.—The term ‘commercial transportation’ means the regular operation for profit of a transport business that uses trucks, tractors, trailers, or semitrailers, or any combination thereof, propelled or drawn by mechanical power on any highway or public road.“(2)Equine for slaughter.—The term ‘equine for slaughter’ means any member of the Equidae family being transferred to a slaughter facility, including an assembly point, feedlot, or stockyard.“(3)Person.—The term ‘person’—“(A) means any individual, partnership, corporation, or cooperative association that regularly engages in the commercial transportation of equine for slaughter; but“(B) does not include any individual or other entity referred to in subparagraph (A) that occasionally transports equine for slaughter incidental to the principal activity of the individual or other entity in production agriculture.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1942–2017 · leading case: Pamela Caver v. Cent. Alabama Elec. Coop., 845 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pamela Caver v. Cent. Alabama Elec. Coop., 845 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 2017). “1363; accord 7 U.S.C. § 902 (a). The federal government thus initiated this program of rural electrification.”
Cessna v. Rea Energy Coop., Inc., 258 F. Supp. 3d 566 (W.D. Pa. 2017). “” 7 U.S.C. § 902 (a), And its provisions leave ample room for state regulation, meaning field preemption is inapplicable here.”
Tlingit-Haida Reg'l Elec. Auth. v. State, 15 P.3d 754 (Alaska 2001). “7U.S.C. § 902(a). 41 . Arkansas Elec. Coop.”
Greensboro Lumber Co. v. Georgia Power Co., 643 F. Supp. 1345 (N.D. Ga. 1986). “, 7 U.S.C. § 902 , to describe electric service from a central generation facility that serves numerous consumers.”
Cass Cnty. Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Wold Props., Inc., 249 N.W.2d 514 (N.D. 1976). · cites it 2× “The statutory authority for the making of such loans by the Administrator of the Rural Electrification Administration is found in 7 U.S.C. § 902 , which provides, in part: “The Administrator is authorized and empowered to make loans in the several States and Territories of the…”
Util. L. Rep. P 13,930 Wabash Valley Power Ass'n, Inc., an Indiana Not-For-Profit Corp. v. Rural Electrification Admin., 988 F.2d 1480 (7th Cir. 1993). “See 7 U.S.C. §§ 902 , 930. Because the opinions in Arkansas Electric detail the legislative history of the RE Act, we will not repeat that here.”
Sierra Club v. United States Dep't of Agric., 716 F.3d 653 (D.C. Cir. 2013). “The Rural Electrification Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 902 (a), 904, authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to make loans for improving electric service in rural areas by financing the construction and operation of power plants.”
Sierra Club v. United States Dep't of Agric., 777 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D.D.C. 2011). “” 7 U.S.C. § 902 (a). The Rural Electrification Act further authorizes RUS to make loans for rural electrification to corporations organized “for the purpose of financing the construction and operation of generating plants, electric transmission and distribution lines or systems…”
Pub. Serv. CO. OF OK. v. Caddo Elec. Coop., 479 P.2d 572 (Okla. 1971). “Competition by cooperatives in municipalities having less than 1500 population is reduced for the reason that the national Rural Electrification Act of 1936, 7 U.S. C.A. § 902, authorizes loans for supplying electric energy to persons in rural areas “who are not receiving…”
GTE Int'l Inc. v. Hunter, 649 F. Supp. 139 (D.P.R. 1986). “7 U.S.C. § 902 . 3. Defendant Hiram H. Puig is General Manager of the PRCA, a Puerto Rican public agency established in 1942 pursuant to Law No.”
Sioux Valley Empire Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. Butz, 367 F. Supp. 686 (D.S.D. 1973). “The Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as amended, provides in pertinent part: (1) 7 U.S.C. § 902 provides in part: The Administrator is authorized and empowered to make loans in the several States and Territories of the United States for rural electrification .”
Givens v. Delta Elec. Power Ass'n, 572 F. Supp. 555 (N.D. Miss. 1983). “It is undisputed that the only federal funding which is received by DEPA, and which could thus trigger plaintiffs’ Title VI claims, are low-interest loans made by the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) pursuant to the Rural Electrification Act, 7 U.S.C. § 902 . As stated…”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— 7 U.S.C. § 902(a) — 1 case
Tlingit-Haida Reg'l Elec. Auth. v. State, 15 P.3d 754 (Alaska 2001). “7U.S.C. § 902(a). 41 . Arkansas Elec. Coop.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.