8 U.S.C. § 1375
Repealed. Pub. L. 109–162, title VIII, § 833(g), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3077
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2002–2019 · leading case: Cozayatl Sampedro v. Schriro
Cozayatl Sampedro v. Schriro (2019)
“See 8 U.S.C. § 1375 (g)(10)."); see also Morales v.”
European Connections & Tours, Inc. v. Gonzales (2007)
“The 1996 Mail-Order Bride Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1375 , was the first attempt by Congress to regulate the mail-order bride industry.”
Fox v. Encounters International (2002)
“Spivack failed to make certain disclosures to her that, she argues, were required under the so called Mail Order Bride Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1375 . These disclosures include warnings that foreign women are vulnerable to domestic abuse, as well as information regarding plaintiff’s…”
Ureneck v. Cui (2003)
“8 U.S.C. § 1375 (d) (1996) (Act). The Act, aimed at immigration fraud, requires that international matchmaking organizations (IMOs) provide immigration and naturalization information and the Report to noncitizens using the IMOs’ services and imposes civil penalties for failure…”
Fox v. Encounters Intl (2006)
“Notably, at all times relevant to this case, EI was governed by the Mail Order Bride Act (MOBA), 8 U.S.C. § 1375 . As part of this 1996 legislation, Congress found that there was a heightened risk of domestic abuse in relationships formed by international matchmaking agencies…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.