8 U.S.C. § 203
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 109
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1927–2022 · leading case: United States Ex Rel. Bradley v. Watkins
United States Ex Rel. Bradley v. Watkins (1947)
“" "Immigrant," as defined in 8 U.S.C.A. § 203 , means "any alien departing from any place outside the United States destined for the United States," with specified exceptions.”
United States Ex Rel. Trinler v. Carusi (1948)
“154 , Act May 26, 1924, 8 U. S.C.A. § 203. [3] The deportation of aliens has by law been committed to the Attorney General.”
Lazarescu v. United States (1952)
“This same day, he was inspected by the Immigrant Inspector at the Port of Baltimore and his admission as a bona fide seaman under Section 3, subdivision 5 of the Act of 1924, 8 U.S.C.A. § 203 (5), was entered on the crew manifest.”
Goldsmith v. United States (1930)
“154 , 162, 8 USCA §§ 203, 215), which provides that the term “immigrant” means an alien departing from any place outside the United States and destined to the United States, except an alien visiting the United States temporarily as a tourist or temporarily for business or…”
United States Ex Rel. Jelic v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization, Ellis Island (1939)
“" At the close of the rehearing on February 20, 1939, the Board of Special Inquiry again voted to exclude the alien for the same reason as before, thus again denying his status as a visitor for a temporary stay in this country (as a "tourist" or "temporarily for business or…”
Papagianakis v. The Samos (1950)
“Alien seamen seeking to enter a port solely in pursuit of their calling as seamen are exempted from requirements relating to immigrants, 8 U.S.C.A. § 203 (5); and they are allowed to land for the purpose of reshipping under such regulations as the Attorney General may prescribe.”
United States Ex Rel. Zapp v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization (1941)
“8 U.S.C.A. § 203 (6). They have now been indicted in the District of Columbia, and have been released on bail awaiting trial, for failing to register as required by the statute providing for the registration of “foreign propagandists,” 22 U.”
Bong Youn Choy and Tung Suck Choy v. Bruce G. Barber, District Director, Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturali (1960)
“And pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 203 (1946 ed.), * “an alien visiting the United States temporarily as a tourist or temporarily for business or pleasure” was not an immigrant.”
United States Ex Rel. Lesto v. Day (1927)
“Whether the obtaining of it without disclosing his admission in 1925 as a temporary visitor under section 3 (2) of the act (8 USCA § 203 [Comp. St. § 4289%aa]) was a fraud upon the department we need not decide.”
United States Lines Co. v. Shaughnessy (1952)
“Plaintiff, however, contends that a contrary construction should apply to alien seamen originally shipped on board in the United States, and relies on legislative history and upon a claimed definition found in § 3 of the Immigration Act of 1924, 8 U.S.C.A. § 203 . The District…”
United States Ex Rel. London v. Phelps (1927)
“154 [8 USCA § 203]). See Chryssikos v. Commissioner, 3 F.”
United States v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique (1928)
“temporary visitor under clause 2, §' 3, of the Act of 1924 (8 USCA § 203(2). Subdivision (f), § 2, of the Act of 1924 (8 USCA § 202(f), provides that a visa shall not issue if it be believed that the alien is inadmissible.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 203(1) — 1 case
— 8 U.S.C. § 203(2) — 3 cases
United States v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique (1928)
“temporary visitor under clause 2, §' 3, of the Act of 1924 (8 USCA § 203(2). Subdivision (f), § 2, of the Act of 1924 (8 USCA § 202(f), provides that a visa shall not issue if it be believed that the alien is inadmissible.”
— 8 U.S.C. § 203(5) — 3 cases
— 8 U.S.C. § 203(6) — 2 cases
Shizuko Kumanomido v. Nagle (1930)
Ex parte Naoe Minamiji (1929)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.