9 U.S.C. § 15
Inapplicability of the Act of State doctrine
Enforcement of arbitral agreements, confirmation of arbitral awards, and execution upon judgments based on orders confirming such awards shall not be refused on the basis of the Act of State doctrine.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 81
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1929–2026 · leading case: Forsythe Int'l, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Co. of Texas, 915 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1990).
Forsythe Int'l, S.A. v. Gibbs Oil Co. of Texas, 915 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1990). “The statute that governs appellate jurisdiction of district court decisions in arbitration cases authorizes an appeal from an order vacating an arbitration award, 9 U.S.C. § 15 (a)(1)(E), or from “a final decision with respect to an arbitration,” 9 U.”
Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson, 513 U.S. 265 (1995). “, 9 U. S. C. § 15 (eliminating the Act of State doctrine as a bar to arbitration); 9 U.”
AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. Clark, 558 So. 2d 358 (Ala. 1990). “All parties agree, as do we, that the defendants do indeed have a right to appeal the trial court's denial under 9 U.S.C. § 15 , the recent amendment to the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"); but the parties stoutly dispute whether the appeals were timely filed.”
Hays & Co., as Tr. for Monge Oil Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 885 F.2d 1149 (3rd Cir. 1989). “4670, 4671, codified at 9 U.S.C.A. § 15 , (“Judicial Improvements Act”) signed November 19, 1988.”
Batton v. Green, 801 S.W.2d 923 (Tex. App. 1990). “(b) Except as otherwise provided in section 1292(b) of title 28, an appeal may not be taken from an interlocutory order (1) granting a stay of action under section 3 of this title; (2) directing arbitration to proceed under section 4 of this title; (3) compelling arbitration…”
Repub. of Ecuador v. ChevronTexaco Corp., 376 F. Supp. 2d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). “” 9 U.S.C.A. § 15 (West 2005). Although this provision is .”
James G. Neal v. Hardee's Food Sys., Inc., 918 F.2d 34 (5th Cir. 1990). “WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 15 , appellant Har-dee’s Food Systems, Inc.”
Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. 1992). “1990); 9 U.S.C. § 15 (1988), amended by 9 U.S.C.”
United Offshore Co. v. S. Deepwater Pipeline Co., 899 F.2d 405 (5th Cir. 1990). “1 Southern Deepwater now seeks to dissolve the injunction and to compel arbitration via an interlocutory appeal taken pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 15 . United Offshore and Southern Deepwa-ter are equal partners in Sea Robin Pipeline Company.”
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,913 Asset Allocation & Mgmt. Co. v. W. Employers Ins. Co., 892 F.2d 566 (7th Cir. 1990). “9 U.S.C. § 15 (b)(2). The denial of the motion to transfer presents a closer question, since it is inconceivable that Judge Conlon would have enjoined Western from proceeding in a more convenient forum.”
Thomson McKinnon Sec., Inc. v. Kerrean L. Salter, Am. Arbitration Ass'n, 873 F.2d 1397 (11th Cir. 1989). “Specifically, 9 U.S.C. § 15 now provides: (a) An appeal may be taken from— (1) an order— (A) refusing a stay of any action under section 3 of this title, (B) denying a petition under section 4 of this title to order arbitration to proceed, (C) denying an application under…”
Apollo Comput., Inc. v. Helge Berg, 886 F.2d 469 (1st Cir. 1989). “4670-71, codified at 9 U.S.C. § 15 , Congress provided that "an appeal may not be taken from an interlocutory order .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.