Utah Code » Title 13, Chapter 11 — Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act

Utah Code § 13-11-8

Powers of division

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to the authority described in Sections

13-2-106

and

13-2-107

, the division may conduct research, hold public hearings, make inquiries, and publish studies relating to consumer sales acts or practices.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2023 · leading case: In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation (2004) med “” Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-8 (6). The plaintiffs do not allege that the dealer association defendants, CADA and NADA, regularly solicit, engage in, or enforce consumer transactions.”
Fell v. Alco Capital Group (2023) utahctapp · cites it 2× “[m]isrepresent that the supplier has the particular license, bond, insurance, qualifications, or expertise that is related to the work to be performed.”
Miller v. Basic Research, LLC (2010) utd · cites it 2× “46 Defendants argue that Section 13-11-19 of the UCSPA allows for a class action remedy only in three limited situations: 1) an act or practice specified as violating the UCSPA by a rule adopted under Subsection 13-11-8(2) before the consumer transaction on which the action is…”
Johnson v. Blendtec (2020) utd · cites it 2× “Section 13-11-19(4)(a) provides that consumer class actions for money damages are only cognizable if the consumer’s damages were caused by one of the following actions: an act or practice specified as violating this chapter by a rule adopted by the enforcing authority under…”
Fullmer v. A-1 Collection Agency (2022) utd · cites it 2× “caused by an act or practice[:]” (1) “specified as violating this chapter by a rule adopted by the enforcing authority under Subsection 13-11-8(2) before the consumer transaction on which the action is based[;]” (2) “declared to violate Section 13-11-4 or 13-11-5 by a final…”
— Utah Code § 13-11-8(2) — 4 cases
Fell v. Alco Capital Group (2023) utahctapp “[m]isrepresent that the supplier has the particular license, bond, insurance, qualifications, or expertise that is related to the work to be performed.”
Miller v. Basic Research, LLC (2010) utd “46 Defendants argue that Section 13-11-19 of the UCSPA allows for a class action remedy only in three limited situations: 1) an act or practice specified as violating the UCSPA by a rule adopted under Subsection 13-11-8(2) before the consumer transaction on which the action is…”
Johnson v. Blendtec (2020) utd “Section 13-11-19(4)(a) provides that consumer class actions for money damages are only cognizable if the consumer’s damages were caused by one of the following actions: an act or practice specified as violating this chapter by a rule adopted by the enforcing authority under…”
Fullmer v. A-1 Collection Agency (2022) utd “caused by an act or practice[:]” (1) “specified as violating this chapter by a rule adopted by the enforcing authority under Subsection 13-11-8(2) before the consumer transaction on which the action is based[;]” (2) “declared to violate Section 13-11-4 or 13-11-5 by a final…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.