Utah Code § 73-1-7
Enlargement for joint use of ditch
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
When a person with no existing shareholder or contractual rights in the canal or ditch described in this Subsection (1) desires to convey water for irrigation or any other beneficial purpose and there is a canal or ditch already constructed that can be used or enlarged to convey the required quantity of water, the person may use or enlarge the canal or ditch already constructed if:
the canal or ditch can be:
used without displacing current users or exceeding free board capacity; or
enlarged to convey the required quantity of water necessary to deliver all water authorized for delivery to authorized users of the canal or ditch, provide adequate free board capacity, and carry the additional quantity of water requested by the person;
the person compensates:
the owner of the canal or ditch to be used or enlarged for the damage caused by the use or enlargement; and
each landowner whose land is encumbered by an easement related to the canal or ditch if the carrying of additional water will expand the scope of the easement;
the person pays an equitable proportion of the maintenance and operation of the canal or ditch jointly used or enlarged; and
An enlargement made in accordance with Subsection (1) shall be made between October 1 and March 1, unless another time is agreed to with:
the owner of the canal or ditch; and
each landowner whose land is encumbered by an easement related to the canal or ditch if the carrying of additional water will expand the scope of the easement.
The additional water turned in to the canal or ditch shall bear its proportion of loss by evaporation and seepage.
Before use or enlargement is allowed in accordance with this section, the person seeking to use or enlarge the canal or ditch shall negotiate in good faith to enter into a written contract governing the relationship, including terms of use and payment, between the person and the following:
the canal or ditch owner; and
each landowner whose land is encumbered by an easement related to the canal or ditch if the carrying of additional water will expand the scope of the easement.
A person seeking to use or enlarge a canal or ditch in accordance with this section may not rely on the right-of-way provisions of Section 73-1-6 against:
an owner of the canal or ditch unless the person has:
attempted in good faith to enter into a written contract pursuant to Subsection (4)(a); and
failed to enter into a written contract; and
a landowner whose land is encumbered by an easement related to the canal or ditch if the carrying of additional water will expand the scope of the easement unless the person has:
attempted in good faith to enter into a written contract pursuant to Subsection (4)(b); and
failed to enter into a written contract.
Unless otherwise agreed to in the written contract referenced in Subsection (4)(a), a person using an existing canal or ditch under this section:
does not acquire any voting rights in the entity owning the canal or ditch not already possessed by a person;
does not acquire any rights to direct the operation of the canal or ditch;
may not add water to the canal or ditch that impairs the water quality in the canal or ditch, or increases the cost of any treatment, to a degree that adversely impacts the intended use of the water already in the canal or ditch;
may not add water to the canal or ditch that exceeds the capacity of the canal or ditch, including free board capacity;
may not modify any water rights without state engineer approval;
shall pay an equitable proportion of construction or upgrade costs, including any related debt service, incurred by the owner of the canal or ditch within five years before the day on which the person begins use of the existing canal or ditch;
is liable for an equitable proportion of any liability arising out of the operation or maintenance of the canal or ditch unless the event giving rise to the liability was caused solely by the person or by the owner of the canal or ditch;
is solely liable for any liability arising out of the operation or maintenance of the canal or ditch if the event giving rise to the liability was caused solely by the person; and
is not liable for any liability arising out of the operation or maintenance of the canal or ditch if the event giving rise to the liability was caused solely by the owner of the canal or ditch.
This section is not applicable to any type of water conveyance infrastructure other than a canal or ditch described in this section.
Nothing in this section will eliminate a criminal penalty resulting from conduct prohibited by Section 73-1-15.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1961–2016 · leading case: Green River Canal Co. v. Thayn
Green River Canal Co. v. Thayn (2003)
“This argument runs contrary to Utah water law, which gives water users the right of eminent domain to share in the use of existing ditches and canals. Utah Code section 73-1-7 gives any person who- wishes to convey water for a beneficial purpose the right “to use or enlarge” any…”
Bresee v. Barton (2016)
“” Utah Code Ann. § 73-1-7 (1) (LexisNexis 2012).”
Canyon View Irrigation Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co. (1980)
“The party who undertakes to operate the canal is entitled to a pro-rata contribution for operation and maintenance costs.”
Gunnison-Fayette Canal Company v. Roberts (1961)
“For that reason Section 73-1-7, U.C.A. 1953 entitles B to convey in the existing canal by making payment for doing so.”
Clearwater Farms LLC v. Giles (2016)
“Utah Code Ann. § 73-1-7 (LexisNexis 2009).”
— Utah Code § 73-1-7(1) — 1 case
Bresee v. Barton (2016)
“” Utah Code Ann. § 73-1-7 (1) (LexisNexis 2012).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.