Utah Code
Utah Code § 9-9-201 (2026)
Assumption by state of criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indians and Indian territory
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The state of Utah hereby obligates and binds itself to assume criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indians and Indian territory, country, and lands or any portion thereof within this state in accordance with the consent of the United States given by the Act of Congress of April 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 78-80 (Public Law 284, 90th Congress), to the extent authorized by that act and this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2021 · leading case: MacArthur v. San Juan Cnty., 391 F. Supp. 2d 895 (D. Utah 2005).
MacArthur v. San Juan Cnty., 391 F. Supp. 2d 895 (D. Utah 2005). “See Utah Code Ann. §§ 9-9-201 through 9-9-213 (2003); Pub.”
MacArthur v. San Juan Cnty., 405 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (D. Utah 2005). “” As explained in this court’s October 12th Memorandum Opinion and Order, Utah Code Ann. §§ 9-9-201 through 9-9-213 (2003) has no bearing upon the issues in this case.”
State v. Reber, 2005 UT App 485 (Utah Ct. App. 2005). “" Utah Code Ann. § 9-9-201 (2008). Utah Code section 9-9-213 provides for concurrent state and federal jurisdiction over hunting on reservations.”
UTE Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. Lawrence, 312 F. Supp. 3d 1219 (D. Utah 2018). “In Utah Code Ann. § 9-9-201 , Utah accepted the jurisdiction, granted by Congress, to preside over civil matters involving Indians.”
Four Corners Health Care v. Roots Home Health Care (D. Utah 2021). “41 Utah Code Ann. § 9-9-201 . 42 Utah Code Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.