green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vance
See State v. Vance, 159 Wn.2d 1011 , 152 P.3d 1032 (2007). ¶7 In VanDelft, we construed Blakely to require that a jury, not a judge, must make factual determinations supporting exceptional consecutive sentences. “ ‘[T]he conclusion that allowing a current offense to go unpunished is clearly too lenient is a factual determination that cannot be made by the trial court following Blakely.’ ” VanDelft, 158 Wn.2d at 742 (quoting State v. Hughes, 154 Wn.2d 118, 140 , 110 P.3d 192 (2005), abrogated on other grounds by Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S. 212 , 126 S. Ct. 2546 , 165 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vance
See State v. Vance, 159 Wash.2d 1011 , 152 P.3d 1032 (2007). ¶ 7 In VanDelft, we construed Blakely to require that a jury, not a judge, must make factual determinations supporting exceptional consecutive sentences. "`[T]he conclusion that allowing a current offense to go unpunished is clearly too lenient is a factual determination that cannot be made by the trial court following Blakely . '" VanDelft, 158 Wash.2d at 742 , 147 P.3d 573 (quoting State v. Hughes, 154 Wash.2d 118, 140 , 110 P.3d 192 (2005), abrogated on other grounds by Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S. 212 , 126 S.Ct. 2546 , 165 …
STATE
v.
FOWLER.
v.
FOWLER.
78764-6.
Washington Supreme Court.
Mar 6, 2007.
Published
Petition for review Denied.