Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 10.97.130 (2026)
Child victims of sexual assaults and commercial sexual exploitation, identification confidential
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Information revealing the specific details that describe the alleged or proven child victim of sexual assault or commercial sexual exploitation under age 18, or the identity or contact information of an alleged or proven child victim of sexual assault or commercial sexual exploitation under age 18 is confidential and not subject to release to the press or public without the permission of the child victim and the child's legal guardian. Identifying information includes the child victim's name, addresses, location, photographs, and in cases in which the child victim is a relative, stepchild, or stepsibling of the alleged perpetrator, identification of the relationship between the child and the alleged perpetrator. Contact information includes phone numbers, email addresses, social media profiles, and user names and passwords. Contact information or information identifying the child victim of sexual assault or commercial sexual exploitation may be released to law enforcement, prosecutors, judges, defense attorneys, or private or governmental agencies that provide services to the child victim of sexual assault. Prior to release of any criminal history record information, the releasing agency shall delete any contact information or information identifying a child victim of sexual assault or commercial sexual exploitation from the information except as provided in this section.
(2) This section does not apply to court documents or other materials admitted in open judicial proceedings.
(3) For purposes of this section, "commercial sexual exploitation" has the same meaning as in RCW 7.105.010.
Notes:
Effective date—2024 c 298: See note following RCW 9A.40.100.
Findings—Intent—Severability—1992 c 188: See notes following RCW 7.69A.020.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2013–2019 · leading case: State v. White, 827 S.E.2d 80 (N.C. 2019).
State v. White, 827 S.E.2d 80 (N.C. 2019). “(2017) (stating that the name, address, and identity of any victim under the age of 18 at the time of the alleged sexual offense shall not appear on indictment or any other public record, and requiring that initials or a fictitious name be used instead; any document identifying…”
Donna Charbonneau On Behalf Of Olivia Charbonneau, Resp/cross App v. Tanner Foster, App/cross App (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “However, the court erred in denying the request to redact under RCW 10.97.130 on the grounds that "Deputy 12 Foster also argues that the statute violates due process by precluding evidence of voluntary intoxication.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.