Wash. Rev. Code » Title 11 · Chapter 11.110

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.110.120

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The attorney general may institute appropriate proceedings to secure compliance with this chapter and to secure the proper administration of any trust or other relationship to which this chapter applies. He or she shall be notified of all judicial proceedings involving or affecting the charitable trust or its administration in which, at common law, he or she is a necessary or proper party as representative of the public beneficiaries. The notification shall be given as provided in RCW 11.96A.110, but this notice requirement may be waived at the discretion of the attorney general. The powers and duties of the attorney general provided in this chapter are in addition to his or her existing powers and duties, and are not to be construed to limit or to restrict the exercise of the powers or the performance of the duties of the attorney general or of any prosecuting attorney which they may exercise or perform under any other provision of law. Except as provided herein, nothing in this chapter shall impair or restrict the jurisdiction of any court with respect to any of the matters covered by it.
[ 2010 c 8 s 2095; 1999 c 42 s 632; 1985 c 30 s 125. Prior: 1984 c 149 s 158; 1967 ex.s. c 53 s 12. Formerly RCW 19.10.120.]

Notes:

Effective date—1999 c 42: See RCW 11.96A.902.
Short title—Application—Purpose—Severability—1985 c 30: See RCW 11.02.900 through 11.02.903.
Severability—Effective dates—1984 c 149: See notes following RCW 11.02.005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: Lundberg v. Coleman
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lundberg v. Coleman (2002) washctapp “2d 247 (1961); see also RCW 11.110.120. State v. Taylor, 58 Wn.2d 252, 256-57 , 362 P.”
In re Breast Cancer Prevention Fund (2017) wawb · cites it 2× “” Here, BCPF was domiciled in Washington, conducted business in Washington, and funds were solicited by Legacy through operations in Washington.”
Lundberg v. Coleman (2002) washctapp “2d 247 (1961); see also RCW 11.110.120. [11] Taylor, 58 Wash.2d at 256-57 , 362 P.”
In the Matter of the Estate of: K. Wendell Reugh (2019) washctapp “w/ 35855-1-III) In re Estate of Reugh Co-Trustee), and the Washington Attorney General (as a necessary party under RCW 11.110.120). We anticipate that a settlement, memorialized by a binding TEDRA Agreement, would provide for an immediate distribution to the Inland Northwest…”
Comm'r “Code Ann. secs. 11.110.010 , 11.110.120 (West 2006).”
UMB Bank, N.A. v. Eagle Crest Apartments, LLC (2025) washctapp “Finally, HFF cites RCW 11.110.120. This last statute declares: The attorney general may institute appropriate proceedings to secure compliance with this chapter and to secure the proper administration of any trust or other relationship to which this chapter applies.”
In Re The Complex Litigation Div. Of Wa Ag (2026) washctapp “100 may be a precursor to enforcement action under RCW 11.110.120 or other statutory authority, under the CTA, discovery of unlawful acts is an authorized end in and of itself.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.