Wash. Rev. Code » Title 11 · Chapter 11.48

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.48.050

Allowance of necessary expenses

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
He or she shall be allowed all necessary expenses in the care, management, and settlement of the estate.
[ 2010 c 8 s 2034; 1965 c 145 s 11.48.050. Prior: 1917 c 156 s 156; RRS s 1526; prior: Code 1881 s 1541; 1854 p 295 s 164.]

Notes:

Rules of court: SPR 98.12W.
Attorney's fee to contestant of erroneous account or report: RCW 11.76.070.
Broker's fee and closing expenses—Sale, mortgage or lease: RCW 11.56.265.
Compensation—Attorney's fee: RCW 11.48.210.
Monument, expense of: RCW 11.76.130.
Order of payment of debts: RCW 11.76.110.
Will contests, costs: RCW 11.24.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1965–2025 · leading case: Estate Of: Randall J. Langeland. Janell Boone, App. / X-res. v. Sharon Drown, Res. / X-app.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Estate Of: Randall J. Langeland. Janell Boone, App. / X-res. v. Sharon Drown, Res. / X-app. (2016) washctapp · cites it 2× “56 RCW 11.48.050 provides that an estate’s personal representative “shall be allowed all necessary expenses in the care, management, and settlement of the estate.”
In Re Estate of Shaughnessy (1985) wash · cites it 2× “The Court of Appeals was correct in dismissing this issue. IV The general rule is that personal representatives who perform their duty to defend a will in good faith may, in the discretion of the trial court, recover personal representative and attorney fees and costs.”
In Re The Estate Of Richard D. Kolesar (2023) washctapp “The personal representative additionally requests an award of fees pursuant to RCW 11.48.050. This statute states that the personal representative “shall be allowed all necessary expenses in the care, management, and settlement of the estate.”
Gwinn v. Church of the Nazarene (1965) wash “050, and neither the costs of this appeal nor any attorneys’ fees in connection with this appeal shall be chargeable to the estate under RCW 11.48.050. For the reasons given above, the trial court’s summary judgment is affirmed.”
In Re The Estate Of Elma Kangas Dale Kangas, V Richard Kangas, P.r. (2017) washctapp · cites it 4× “” RCW 11.48.050. Again, we review the trial court’s decision to award fees for abuse of discretion.”
In the Matter of the Estate of: Danny L. Snapp (2025) washctapp “Although RCW 11.48.050 allows a personal representative all of their necessary expenses in the administration of the estate, Snapp breached his fiduciary duty to the Estate when he withdrew from the Estate monies well excess of his reasonable and 6 No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.