Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 16.52.200 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The sentence imposed for a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor violation of this chapter may be deferred or suspended in accordance with RCW 3.66.067 and 3.66.068, however the probationary period shall be two years.
(2) In case of multiple misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor convictions, the sentences shall be consecutive, however the probationary period shall remain two years.
(3) In addition to the penalties imposed by the court, the court shall order the forfeiture of all animals held by law enforcement or animal care and control authorities under the provisions of this chapter if any one of the animals involved dies as a result of a violation of this chapter or if the defendant has a prior conviction under this chapter. In other cases the court may enter an order requiring the owner to forfeit the animal if the court deems the animal's treatment to have been severe and likely to reoccur.
(4) Any person convicted of animal cruelty or animal fighting shall be prohibited from owning, caring for, possessing, or residing with any animals for a period of time as follows:
(a) Two years for a first conviction of animal cruelty in the second degree under RCW 16.52.207;
(b) Permanently for a first conviction of animal cruelty in the first degree under RCW 16.52.205 or for a first conviction of animal fighting under RCW 16.52.117;
(c) Permanently for a second or subsequent conviction of animal cruelty, except as provided in subsection (5) of this section.
(5) If a person has no more than two convictions of animal cruelty and each conviction is for animal cruelty in the second degree, the person may petition the sentencing court in which the most recent animal cruelty conviction occurred, for a restoration of the right to own, care for, possess, or reside with animals five years after the date of the second conviction. In determining whether to grant the petition, the court shall consider, but not be limited to, the following:
(a) The person's prior animal cruelty in the second degree convictions;
(b) The type of harm or violence inflicted upon the animals;
(c) Whether the person has completed the conditions imposed by the court as a result of the underlying convictions;
(d) Whether the person complied with the prohibition on owning, caring for, possessing, or residing with animals; and
(e) Any other matters the court finds reasonable and material to consider in determining whether the person is likely to abuse another animal.
The court may delay its decision on forfeiture under subsection (3) of this section until the end of the probationary period.
(6) In addition to fines and court costs, the defendant, only if convicted or in agreement, shall be liable for reasonable costs incurred pursuant to this chapter by law enforcement agencies, animal care and control agencies, or authorized private or public entities involved with the care of the animals. Reasonable costs include expenses of the investigation, and the animal's care, euthanization, or adoption.
(7) If convicted, the defendant shall also pay a civil penalty of $1,000 to the county to prevent cruelty to animals. These funds shall be used to prosecute offenses under this chapter and to care for forfeited animals pending trial.
(8) If a person violates the prohibition on owning, caring for, possessing, or residing with animals under subsection (4) of this section, that person:
(a) Is guilty of a misdemeanor for the first violation;
(b) Is guilty of a gross misdemeanor for the second violation; and
(c) Is guilty of a class C felony for the third and each subsequent violation.
(9) As a condition of the sentence imposed under this chapter or RCW 9.08.070 through 9.08.078, the court may also order the defendant to participate in an available animal cruelty prevention or education program or obtain available psychological counseling to treat mental health problems contributing to the violation's commission. The defendant shall bear the costs of the program or treatment.
(10) Nothing in this section limits the authority of a law enforcement officer, animal control officer, custodial agency, or court to remove, adopt, euthanize, or require forfeiture of an animal under RCW 16.52.085.
[ 2025 c 220 s 5; 2020 c 158 s 5; 2016 c 181 s 2; 2011 c 172 s 4; 2009 c 287 s 3; 2003 c 53 s 113; 1994 c 261 s 14; 1987 c 335 s 2.]

Notes:

IntentEffective date2003 c 53: See notes following RCW 2.48.180.
FindingIntent1994 c 261: See note following RCW 16.52.011.
ConstructionSeverability1987 c 335: See notes following RCW 16.52.085.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2003–2024 · leading case: State v. Deskins, 322 P.3d 780 (Wash. 2014).
State v. Deskins, 322 P.3d 780 (Wash. 2014). · cites it 10× “It imposed several conditions on the sentence, including requiring Deskins to undergo psychological counseling, noting that it had this power under former RCW 16.52.200 (2003). 2 Then the court went on to say: The other conditions are: do not own, acquire or live with pets or…”
State v. Peterson, 301 P.3d 1060 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 8× “We note that former RCW 16.52.200(5) (2011) was renumbered as RCW 16.”
State v. Paulson, 131 Wash. App. 579 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “680 and RCW 16.52.200 to sentence Loney for violating RCW 16.”
State v. Paulson, 128 P.3d 133 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 7× “680 and RCW 16.52.200 to sentence Loney for violating RCW 16.”
In re the Det. of Broten, 115 Wash. App. 252 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “030(9): “Community supervision” means a period of time during which, a convicted offender is subject to crime-related prohibitions and other sentence conditions imposed by a court pursuant to this chapter or RCW 16.”
State v. King, 253 P.3d 120 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “(2) "Community supervision" means a period of time during which a convicted offender is subject to crime-related prohibitions and other sentence conditions imposed by a court pursuant to this chapter or RCW 16.52.200(6) or 46.61.524. Where the court finds that any offender has a…”
State v. King, 162 Wash. App. 234 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “(2) “Community supervision” means a period of time during which a convicted offender is subject to crime-related prohibitions and other sentence conditions imposed by a court pursuant to this chapter or RCW 16.52.200(6) or 46.61.524. Where the court finds that any offender has a…”
State v. Richards, 559 P.3d 107 (Wash. 2024). “, RCW 16.52.200(2) (mandating court ordered forfeiture of certain animals owned by anyone in violation of the animal cruelty statute); see also RCW 69.”
State v. Buck, 544 P.3d 506 (Wash. 2024). “” “Community supervision” is defined as a period of time during which a convicted offender is subject to crime- related prohibitions and other sentence conditions imposed by a court pursuant to this chapter or RCW 16.52.200(6) or 46.61.524. RCW 9.94B.”
In Re Det. of Broten, 62 P.3d 514 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “545, served in the community subject to controls placed on the offender's movement and activities by the department.... [6] RCW 9.”
State of Washington v. Thelma Winger (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 8× “Cruel punishment As part of its criminal sentence, the trial court imposed a lifetime ban on dog and horse possession based on former RCW 16.52.200(4)(b) (2016), and further ordered that Ms.”
State v. Deskins (Wash. 2014). · cites it 10× “It imposed several conditions on the sentence, including requiring Deskins to undergo psychological counseling, noting that it had this power under former RCW 16.52.200 (2003). 2 Then the court went on to say: The other conditions are: do not own, acquire or live with pets or…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 16.52.200(1) — 2 cases
State v. Deskins, 322 P.3d 780 (Wash. 2014). “It imposed several conditions on the sentence, including requiring Deskins to undergo psychological counseling, noting that it had this power under former RCW 16.52.200 (2003). 2 Then the court went on to say: The other conditions are: do not own, acquire or live with pets or…”
State v. Deskins (Wash. 2014). “It imposed several conditions on the sentence, including requiring Deskins to undergo psychological counseling, noting that it had this power under former RCW 16.52.200 (2003). 2 Then the court went on to say: The other conditions are: do not own, acquire or live with pets or…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 16.52.200(2) — 1 case
State v. Richards, 559 P.3d 107 (Wash. 2024). “, RCW 16.52.200(2) (mandating court ordered forfeiture of certain animals owned by anyone in violation of the animal cruelty statute); see also RCW 69.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 16.52.200(3) — 2 cases
State v. Deskins, 322 P.3d 780 (Wash. 2014). “It imposed several conditions on the sentence, including requiring Deskins to undergo psychological counseling, noting that it had this power under former RCW 16.52.200 (2003). 2 Then the court went on to say: The other conditions are: do not own, acquire or live with pets or…”
State v. Deskins (Wash. 2014). “It imposed several conditions on the sentence, including requiring Deskins to undergo psychological counseling, noting that it had this power under former RCW 16.52.200 (2003). 2 Then the court went on to say: The other conditions are: do not own, acquire or live with pets or…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 16.52.200(4) — 2 cases
State v. Deskins, 322 P.3d 780 (Wash. 2014). “It imposed several conditions on the sentence, including requiring Deskins to undergo psychological counseling, noting that it had this power under former RCW 16.52.200 (2003). 2 Then the court went on to say: The other conditions are: do not own, acquire or live with pets or…”
State v. Deskins (Wash. 2014). “It imposed several conditions on the sentence, including requiring Deskins to undergo psychological counseling, noting that it had this power under former RCW 16.52.200 (2003). 2 Then the court went on to say: The other conditions are: do not own, acquire or live with pets or…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 16.52.200(4)(b) — 1 case
State of Washington v. Thelma Winger (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “Cruel punishment As part of its criminal sentence, the trial court imposed a lifetime ban on dog and horse possession based on former RCW 16.52.200(4)(b) (2016), and further ordered that Ms.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 16.52.200(5) — 3 cases
State v. Peterson, 301 P.3d 1060 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “We note that former RCW 16.52.200(5) (2011) was renumbered as RCW 16.”
State of Washington v. Thelma Winger (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “Cruel punishment As part of its criminal sentence, the trial court imposed a lifetime ban on dog and horse possession based on former RCW 16.52.200(4)(b) (2016), and further ordered that Ms.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 16.52.200(6) — 14 cases
State v. Peterson, 301 P.3d 1060 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “We note that former RCW 16.52.200(5) (2011) was renumbered as RCW 16.”
State v. Paulson, 131 Wash. App. 579 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “680 and RCW 16.52.200 to sentence Loney for violating RCW 16.”
In re the Det. of Broten, 115 Wash. App. 252 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “030(9): “Community supervision” means a period of time during which, a convicted offender is subject to crime-related prohibitions and other sentence conditions imposed by a court pursuant to this chapter or RCW 16.”
State v. Paulson, 128 P.3d 133 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “680 and RCW 16.52.200 to sentence Loney for violating RCW 16.”
State v. King, 253 P.3d 120 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “(2) "Community supervision" means a period of time during which a convicted offender is subject to crime-related prohibitions and other sentence conditions imposed by a court pursuant to this chapter or RCW 16.52.200(6) or 46.61.524. Where the court finds that any offender has a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.