Wash. Rev. Code » Title 19 · Chapter 19.205

Wash. Rev. Code § 19.205.060

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The provisions of this chapter may not be waived by any payee.
(2) Any transfer agreement entered into on or after July 22, 2001, by a payee who resides in this state shall provide that disputes under such transfer agreement, including any claim that the payee has breached the agreement, shall be determined in and under the laws of this state. Such a transfer agreement may not authorize the transferee or any other party to confess judgment or consent to entry of judgment against the payee.
(3) Transfer of structured settlement payment rights do not extend to any payments that are life contingent unless, prior to the date on which the payee signs the transfer agreement, the transferee has established and has agreed to maintain procedures reasonably satisfactory to the annuity issuer and the structured settlement obligor for (a) periodically confirming the payee's survival, and (b) giving the annuity issuer and the structured settlement obligor prompt written notice in the event of the payee's death.
(4) No payee who proposes to make a transfer of structured settlement payment rights may incur any penalty, forfeit any application fee or other payment, or otherwise incur any liability to the proposed transferee or any assignee based on any failure of such a transfer to satisfy the conditions of this chapter.
(5) This chapter does not authorize any transfer of structured settlement payment rights in contravention of any law, nor does it imply that any transfer under a transfer agreement entered into prior to July 22, 2001, is valid or invalid.
(6) Compliance with the requirements set forth in RCW 19.205.020 and fulfillment of the conditions set forth in RCW 19.205.030 is the sole responsibility of the transferee in any transfer of structured settlement payment rights, and neither the structured settlement obligor nor the annuity issuer bear any responsibility for, or any liability arising from, noncompliance with the requirements or failure to fulfill the conditions.
[ 2001 c 178 s 7.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2006–2012 · leading case: Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Insurance
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Insurance (2006) washctapp · cites it 2× “¶12 Furthermore, Rapid’s reading of the statute is inconsistent with RCW 19.205.060(6), which places the sole responsibility and liability for noncompliance with the provisions of RCW 19.”
RSL-3B-IL, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Insurance (2012) washctapp “The SSPA requires the transferee to comply with specified notifications, disclosures, and processes designed to protect the payee and interested parties and allow the court to determine whether a transfer is in the payee’s best interests.”
Rapid Settlements Ltd's v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Co. (2006) washctapp “RCW 19.205.060(5). ¶ 36 Symetra contends the transfers should have been found to contravene portions of the North Carolina act, which is somewhat more restrictive than Washington's.”
Dean v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Co. (2006) washctapp “” RCW 19.205.060(5). ¶36 Symetra contends the transfers should have been found to contravene portions of the North Carolina act, which is somewhat more restrictive than Washington’s.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.205.060(5) — 2 cases
Rapid Settlements Ltd's v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Co. (2006) washctapp “RCW 19.205.060(5). ¶ 36 Symetra contends the transfers should have been found to contravene portions of the North Carolina act, which is somewhat more restrictive than Washington's.”
Dean v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Co. (2006) washctapp “” RCW 19.205.060(5). ¶36 Symetra contends the transfers should have been found to contravene portions of the North Carolina act, which is somewhat more restrictive than Washington’s.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 19.205.060(6) — 2 cases
Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Insurance (2006) washctapp “¶12 Furthermore, Rapid’s reading of the statute is inconsistent with RCW 19.205.060(6), which places the sole responsibility and liability for noncompliance with the provisions of RCW 19.”
RSL-3B-IL, Ltd. v. Symetra Life Insurance (2012) washctapp “The SSPA requires the transferee to comply with specified notifications, disclosures, and processes designed to protect the payee and interested parties and allow the court to determine whether a transfer is in the payee’s best interests.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.