Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.405.210 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) No teacher, principal, supervisor, superintendent, or other certificated employee, holding a position as such with a school district, hereinafter referred to as "employee," shall be employed except by written order of a majority of the directors of the district at a regular or special meeting thereof, nor unless he or she is the holder of an effective teacher's certificate or other certificate required by law or the Washington professional educator standards board for the position for which the employee is employed.
(2)(a) The board shall make with each employee employed by it a written contract, which shall be in conformity with the laws of this state, and except as otherwise provided by law and under (b) of this subsection, limited to a term of not more than one year. Every such contract shall be made in duplicate, one copy to be retained by the school district superintendent or secretary and one copy to be delivered to the employee. No contract shall be offered by any board for the employment of any employee who has previously signed an employment contract for that same term in another school district of the state of Washington unless such employee shall have been released from his or her obligations under such previous contract by the board of directors of the school district to which he or she was obligated. Any contract signed in violation of this provision shall be void.
(b) A written contract made by a board with a principal under (a) of this subsection may be for a term of up to three years if the principal has: (i) Been employed as a principal for three or more consecutive years; (ii) been recommended by the superintendent as a candidate for a two or three-year contract because the principal has demonstrated the ability to stabilize instructional practices and received a comprehensive performance rating of level 3 or above in their most recent comprehensive performance evaluation under RCW 28A.405.100; and (iii) met the school district's requirements for satisfying an updated record check under RCW 28A.400.303. A written contract made by a board with a principal under (a) of this subsection for a term of three years may not be renewed before the final year of the contract.
(3) In the event it is determined that there is probable cause or causes that the employment contract of an employee should not be renewed by the district for the next ensuing term such employee shall be notified in writing on or before May 15th preceding the commencement of such term of that determination, or if the omnibus appropriations act has not passed the legislature by the end of the regular legislative session for that year, then notification shall be no later than June 15th, which notification shall specify the cause or causes for nonrenewal of contract. Such determination of probable cause for certificated employees, other than the superintendent, shall be made by the superintendent. Such notice shall be served upon the employee personally, or by certified or registered mail, or by leaving a copy of the notice at the house of his or her usual abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then resident therein. Every such employee so notified, at his or her request made in writing and filed with the president, chair or secretary of the board of directors of the district within 10 days after receiving such notice, shall be granted opportunity for hearing pursuant to RCW 28A.405.310 to determine whether there is sufficient cause or causes for nonrenewal of contract: PROVIDED, That any employee receiving notice of nonrenewal of contract due to an enrollment decline or loss of revenue may, in his or her request for a hearing, stipulate that initiation of the arrangements for a hearing officer as provided for by RCW 28A.405.310(4) shall occur within 10 days following July 15 rather than the day that the employee submits the request for a hearing. If any such notification or opportunity for hearing is not timely given, the employee entitled thereto shall be conclusively presumed to have been reemployed by the district for the next ensuing term upon contractual terms identical with those which would have prevailed if his or her employment had actually been renewed by the board of directors for such ensuing term.
(4) This section shall not be applicable to "provisional employees" as so designated in RCW 28A.405.220; transfer to a subordinate certificated position as that procedure is set forth in RCW 28A.405.230 or 28A.405.245 shall not be construed as a nonrenewal of contract for the purposes of this section.
[ 2023 c 362 s 1; 2016 c 85 s 1; 2010 c 235 s 303; 2009 c 57 s 1; 2005 c 497 s 216; 1996 c 201 s 1; 1990 c 33 s 390. Prior: 1983 c 83 s 1; 1983 c 56 s 11; 1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 114 s 4; 1975 1st ex.s. c 275 s 133; 1973 c 49 s 2; 1970 ex.s. c 15 s 16; prior: 1969 ex.s. c 176 s 143; 1969 ex.s. c 34 s 12; 1969 ex.s. c 15 s 2; 1969 ex.s. c 223 s 28A.67.070; prior: 1961 c 241 s 1; 1955 c 68 s 3; prior: (i) 1909 c 97 p 307 s 5; 1897 c 118 s 55; 1891 c 127 s 14; 1890 p 369 s 37; 1886 p 18 s 47; Code 1881 s 3200; RRS s 4851. (ii) 1943 c 52 s 1, part; 1941 c 179 s 1, part; 1939 c 131 s 1, part; 1925 ex.s. c 57 s 1, part; 1919 c 89 s 3, part; 1915 c 44 s 1, part; 1909 c 97 p 285 s 2, part; 1907 c 240 s 5, part; 1903 c 104 s 17, part; 1901 c 41 s 3, part; 1897 c 118 s 40, part; 1890 p 364 s 26, part; Rem. Supp. 1943 s 4776, part. Formerly RCW 28A.67.070, 28.67.070.]

Notes:

Effective date2016 c 85: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [March 31, 2016]." [ 2016 c 85 s 6.]
Finding2010 c 235: See note following RCW 28A.405.245.
Effective date2009 c 57: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [April 10, 2009]." [ 2009 c 57 s 5.]
IntentPart headings not lawEffective date2005 c 497: See notes following RCW 28A.305.011.
Severability1983 c 56: See note following RCW 28A.195.010.
SavingsSeverability1975-'76 2nd ex.s. c 114: See notes following RCW 28A.400.010.
Severability1970 ex.s. c 15: See note following RCW 28A.230.160.
Rights preservedSeverability1969 ex.s. c 176: See notes following RCW 28A.310.010.
Minimum criteria for the evaluation of certificated employeesFour-level rating evaluation systemProceduresSteering committeeImplementationReportsComprehensive performance evaluation: RCW 28A.405.100.
School superintendentRCW 28A.405.210 not applicable to contract renewal: RCW 28A.400.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Mount Adams Sch. Dist. v. Cook, 81 P.3d 111 (Wash. 2003).
Mount Adams Sch. Dist. v. Cook, 81 P.3d 111 (Wash. 2003). · cites it 7× “When Cook failed to present a valid full-time teacher’s certificate on the first day of the 2000-01 contract year, as required by RCW 28A.405.210, his contract with the District became void by operation of law.”
Moldt v. Tacoma Sch. Dist. No. 10, 12 P.3d 1042 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 11× “10 sued the District, contending they were entitled to continuing contract rights under RCW 28A.405.210. The teachers base their claims upon contracts the District entered into with them between 1989 and 1993, which guaranteed the substitute teachers a minimum number of days of…”
Riley-Hordyk v. Bethel Sch. Dist., 350 P.3d 681 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 7× “RCW 28A.405.210. It further provides that the one-year contracts are automatically renewed for the next year unless certain events occur.”
State v. Roggenkamp, 106 P.3d 196 (Wash. 2005). “15, § 16), recodified as amended at RCW 28A.405.210. Champion, 81 Wash.2d at 673 , 504 P.”
Schlosser v. Bethel Sch. Dist., 333 P.3d 475 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 13× “¶6 Schlosser appealed the Superintendent’s decision to a hearing officer under RCW 28A.405.210 6 , .310(4). 7 Both Schlosser and the District were represented by counsel at the hearing.”
McCormick v. Lake Washington Sch. Dist., 992 P.2d 511 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 3× “McCormick argues that the court’s decision to grant summary judgment was erroneous because Anderson had apparent authority to hire permanent employees and made an offer of employment to her. McCormick argues that a verbal contract was formed.”
McLain v. Kent Sch. Dist. No. 415, 314 P.3d 435 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 5× “¶1 Where a teacher appeals the decision of a school district to not renew a teaching contract under RCW 28A.405.210 and timely requests an administrative hearing, RCW 28Á.”
Sneed v. Barna, 912 P.2d 1035 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Second, Sneed argues that her transfer constituted a nonrenewal of her contract without both notice of probable cause and an opportunity for a hearing, in violation of RCW 28A.405.210. But Sneed never claimed a violation of RCW 28A.”
Sneed v. Barna, 912 P.2d 1035 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Second, Sneed argues that her transfer constituted a nonrenewal of her contract without both notice of probable cause and an opportunity for a hearing, in violation of RCW 28A.405.210. But Sneed never claimed a violation of RCW 28A.”
Busey v. Richland Sch. Dist., 172 F. Supp. 3d 1167 (E.D. Wash. 2016). · cites it 2× “RCW 28A.405.210 expressly protects certificated employees from termination without' cause.”
Michael F. Cronin v. Cent. Valley Sch. Dist. (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 19× “Central Valley School District failed to provide Michael Cronin an opportunity for a timely statutory hearing by rejecting his representative’s request for a hearing, which resulted in the hearing being delayed for almost seven years.”
Petroni v. Bd. of Directors of Deer Park Sch. Dist. No. 414, 113 P.3d 10 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “General statutory provisions for public school teachers ¶15 The general requirements governing employment contracts for public school teachers are set forth in RCW 28A.405.210. Under this provision, written contracts must be issued to all teachers for a period not to exceed one…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.405.210(2)(a) — 1 case
Krzesni v. Wellpinit Sch. Dist. (E.D. Wash. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.