Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.405.900 (2026)
Certain certificated employees exempt from chapter provisions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Certificated employees subject to the provisions of RCW 28A.310.250, 28A.405.100, 28A.405.210, and 28A.405.220 shall not include those certificated employees hired to replace certificated employees who have been granted sabbatical, regular, or other leave by school districts, and shall not include retirees hired for postretirement employment under the provisions of chapter 10, Laws of 2001 2nd sp. sess.
It is not the intention of the legislature that this section apply to any regularly hired certificated employee or that the legal or constitutional rights of such employee be limited, abridged, or abrogated.
[ 2002 c 26 s 1; 2001 2nd sp.s. c 10 s 2; 1990 c 33 s 404; 1972 ex.s. c 142 s 3. Formerly RCW 28A.67.900.]
Notes:
Effective dates—2001 2nd sp.s. c 10: See note following RCW 41.40.037.
Postretirement employment under the teachers' retirement system: RCW 41.32.570.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2000–2020 · leading case: Moldt v. Tacoma Sch. Dist. No. 10, 12 P.3d 1042 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000).
Moldt v. Tacoma Sch. Dist. No. 10, 12 P.3d 1042 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “RCW 28A.405.900. We agree that the substitute teachers are excluded from continuing contract rights; accordingly, we affirm.”
Schlosser v. Bethel Sch. Dist., 333 P.3d 475 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “The amendments did not alter the statute in any way relevant to this case; accordingly, we cite the current version of the statute.”
Michael F. Cronin v. Cent. Valley Sch. Dist. (Wash. Ct. App. 2020). “220; RCW 28A.405.900. Regular employees, such as Cronin, are covered by RCW 28A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.