Wash. Rev. Code » Title 35 · Chapter 35.44

Wash. Rev. Code § 35.44.080

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The notice of hearing upon the assessment roll shall specify the time and place of hearing and shall notify all persons who may desire to object thereto:
(1) To make their objections in writing and to file them with the city or town clerk at or prior to the date fixed for the hearing;
(2) That at the time and place fixed and at times to which the hearing may be adjourned, the council will sit as a board of equalization for the purpose of considering the roll; and
(3) That at the hearing the council or committee or officer will consider the objections made and will correct, revise, raise, lower, change, or modify the roll or any part thereof or set aside the roll and order the assessment to be made de novo.
Following the hearing the council shall confirm the roll by ordinance.
[ 1979 ex.s. c 100 s 2; 1965 c 7 s 35.44.080. Prior: 1929 c 97 s 3, part; 1911 c 98 s 21, part; RRS s 9373, part.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2024 · leading case: Hasit, LLC v. City of Edgewood
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hasit, LLC v. City of Edgewood (2014) washctapp · cites it 3× “It may be that the City intended to convey the notion that of the class of property owners, only those who have filed objections may testify, an interpretation more consistent with surrounding restrictions in RCW 35.44.080. That, however, is not what its communication said.”
City of Ferndale v. Friberg (1987) wash “RCW 35.44.080(1). An appeal must be made within 10 days of the effective date of the roll's confirmation.”
Lansinger v. Local Improvement District 6368 (1972) wash “50), informing them of the time (November 24, 1970) and place where the city council would hear and consider confirmation of the assessment roll, and that objections to confirmation had to be made in writing — all as prescribed by RCW 35.44.080. The Lansingers filed written…”
Knott v. City of Spokane (1983) washctapp “RCW 35.44.080 requires the City to notify those who desire to object to the assessment roll "[t]o make their objections in writing and to file them with the city or town clerk at or prior to the date fixed for the hearing".”
Citizens for Underground Equality v. City of Seattle (1972) washctapp “RCW 35.44.080. Thus there is reserved to rich and poor alike the opportunity to ensure that the statutory scheme, although constitutional, is not administered in an unconstitutionally discriminatory manner.”
Shg Garage Spe, V. City Of Seattle (2024) washctapp · cites it 2× “A city council’s decision may be appealed to the superior court. RCW 35.44.200. The superior court shall confirm the city council’s decision unless it finds “from the evidence that such assessment is founded upon a fundamentally wrong basis and/or the decision of the council or…”
Shg Garage Spe, V. City Of Seattle (2024) washctapp · cites it 2× “070, RCW 35.44.080(2). The city council may also revise or modify the assessment recommendation or order the assessment to be made de novo.”
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of West Richland (1985) washctapp “" RCW 35.44.080. The owners or reputed owners of the property are to be given notice by mail; in addition, the statute provides for notice by publication.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 35.44.080(1) — 1 case
City of Ferndale v. Friberg (1987) wash “RCW 35.44.080(1). An appeal must be made within 10 days of the effective date of the roll's confirmation.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 35.44.080(2) — 3 cases
Hasit, LLC v. City of Edgewood (2014) washctapp “It may be that the City intended to convey the notion that of the class of property owners, only those who have filed objections may testify, an interpretation more consistent with surrounding restrictions in RCW 35.44.080. That, however, is not what its communication said.”
Shg Garage Spe, V. City Of Seattle (2024) washctapp “A city council’s decision may be appealed to the superior court. RCW 35.44.200. The superior court shall confirm the city council’s decision unless it finds “from the evidence that such assessment is founded upon a fundamentally wrong basis and/or the decision of the council or…”
Shg Garage Spe, V. City Of Seattle (2024) washctapp “070, RCW 35.44.080(2). The city council may also revise or modify the assessment recommendation or order the assessment to be made de novo.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 35.44.080(3) — 3 cases
Hasit, LLC v. City of Edgewood (2014) washctapp “It may be that the City intended to convey the notion that of the class of property owners, only those who have filed objections may testify, an interpretation more consistent with surrounding restrictions in RCW 35.44.080. That, however, is not what its communication said.”
Shg Garage Spe, V. City Of Seattle (2024) washctapp “A city council’s decision may be appealed to the superior court. RCW 35.44.200. The superior court shall confirm the city council’s decision unless it finds “from the evidence that such assessment is founded upon a fundamentally wrong basis and/or the decision of the council or…”
Shg Garage Spe, V. City Of Seattle (2024) washctapp “070, RCW 35.44.080(2). The city council may also revise or modify the assessment recommendation or order the assessment to be made de novo.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.