Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 36.32.245 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) No contract for the purchase of materials, equipment, or supplies may be entered into by the county legislative authority or by any elected or appointed officer of the county until after bids have been submitted to the county. Bid specifications shall be in writing and shall be filed with the clerk of the county legislative authority for public inspection. An advertisement shall be published in the official newspaper of the county stating the time and place where bids will be opened, the time after which bids will not be received, the materials, equipment, supplies, or services to be purchased, and that the specifications may be seen at the office of the clerk of the county legislative authority. The advertisement shall be published at least once at least thirteen days prior to the last date upon which bids will be received.

(2) The bids shall be in writing, may be in either hard copy or electronic form as specified by the county, and shall be filed with the clerk. The bids shall be opened and read in public at the time and place named in the advertisement. Contracts requiring competitive bidding under this section may be awarded only to the lowest responsible bidder. Immediately after the award is made, the bid quotations shall be recorded and open to public inspection and shall be available by telephone inquiry. Any or all bids may be rejected for good cause.

(3) For advertisement and formal sealed bidding to be dispensed with as to purchases between ten thousand and fifty thousand dollars, the county legislative authority must use the uniform process to award contracts as provided in RCW 39.04.190. Advertisement and formal sealed bidding may be dispensed with as to purchases of less than ten thousand dollars upon the order of the county legislative authority.

(4) This section does not apply to performance-based contracts, as defined in *RCW 39.35A.020(4), that are negotiated under chapter 39.35A RCW; or contracts and purchases for the printing of election ballots, voting machine labels, and all other election material containing the names of candidates and ballot titles.

(5) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the legislative authority of any county from allowing for preferential purchase of products made from recycled materials or products that may be recycled or reused.

(6) This section does not apply to contracting for public defender services by a county.

[ 2016 c 95 s 9; 2007 c 88 s 1. Prior: 1993 c 233 s 1; 1993 c 198 s 7; 1991 c 363 s 62.]

Notes:

*Reviser's note: RCW 39.35A.020 was amended by 2022 c 128 s 2, changing subsection (4) to subsection (6).

Intent—2016 c 95: See note following RCW 36.62.252.

Purpose—Captions not law—1991 c 363: See notes following RCW 2.32.180.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1994–1996 · leading case: Associated Gen. Contractors of Washington v. KING CTY., 881 P.2d 996 (Wash. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Associated Gen. Contractors of Washington v. KING CTY., 881 P.2d 996 (Wash. 1994). · cites it 5× “240 was originally introduced to the House, the bill also sought to amend RCW 36.32.245, a provision gov *862 erning a county’s purchase of materials, in a fashion similar to the amendment to RCW 36.”

Org. to Preserve Agric. Lands v. Adams Cnty., 913 P.2d 793 (Wash. 1996). · cites it 3× “Specifically, OPAL argues that the Agreement was negotiated in violation of RCW 36.32.245, which requires competitive bidding for contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, or supplies, and RCW 36.”

Org. to Preserve Agr. v. Adams Co., 913 P.2d 793 (Wash. 1996). · cites it 3× “Specifically, OPAL argues that the Agreement was negotiated in violation of RCW 36.32.245, which requires competitive bidding for contracts for the purchase of materials, equipment, or supplies, and RCW 36.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.