Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 4.56.090 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When any judgment has been assigned, the assignment may be filed in the office of the county clerk in the county where the judgment is recorded and a certified copy thereof may be filed in any county where an abstract of such judgment has been filed and from the time of such filing shall be notice of such assignment: PROVIDED, That such assignment of a judgment or such certified copy thereof, may not be filed unless it is properly acknowledged before an officer qualified by law to take acknowledgment of deeds.

[1935 c 22 s 1, part; 1929 c 60 s 5, part; RRS s 447. Prior: 1893 c 42 s 6.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Mitchell v. Washington State Inst. of Pub. Policy, 225 P.3d 280 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mitchell v. Washington State Inst. of Pub. Policy, 225 P.3d 280 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “RCW 4.56.090. Taken alone, there is neither a provision that commands nor a provision that prohibits a court from refusing to allow a party to assign their judgment nor is there a Washington case related to this issue.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.