Wash. Rev. Code § 46.20.332
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
At a formal hearing the department shall consider its records and may receive sworn testimony and may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of relevant books and papers in the manner and subject to the conditions provided in chapter 5.56 RCW relating to the issuance of subpoenas. In addition the department may require a reexamination of the licensee or applicant. Proceedings at a formal hearing shall be recorded stenographically or by mechanical device. Upon the conclusion of a formal hearing, if not heard by the director or a person authorized by him or her to make final decisions regarding the issuance, denial, suspension, or revocation of licenses, the referee or board shall make findings on the matters under consideration and may prepare and submit recommendations to the director or such person designated by the director who is authorized to make final decisions regarding the issuance, denial, suspension, or revocation of licenses.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1972–2016 · leading case: Ingram v. Department of Licensing
Ingram v. Department of Licensing (2007)
“As authority, the hearing officers cited RCW 46.20.332, dictating that the department “shall consider its records,” and former WAC 308-103-100, -120, and -150(9) (2002), authorizing the hearing officer to consider relevant evidence received before the end of the hearing.”
Ingram v. Department of Licensing (2007)
“As authority, the hearing officers cited RCW 46.20.332, dictating that the department "shall consider its records," and former WAC 308-103-100, -120, -150(9) (2002), authorizing the hearing officer to consider relevant evidence received before the end of the hearing.”
Prostov v. Department of Licensing (2015)
“RCW 46.20.332. Following a determination at the hearing, the driver may appeal to the superior court for a de novo hearing.”
Binckley v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1976)
“329, RCW 46.20.332, and RCW 46.20.333, Binckley sought a de novo trial in superior court as afforded by RCW 46.”
Department of Licensing v. Lax (1994)
“RCW 46.20.332. If dissatisfied with the outcome of the formal hearing, the driver may then appeal to the superior court.”
Martinez v. Department of Licensing (1993)
“RCW 46.20.332. 4 If the Department's final order of revocation is challenged, the process moves to the third step.”
Metcalf v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1974)
“” RCW 46.20.332. The third “determination” occurs if the driver chooses to appeal to superior court, RCW 46.”
Lewis v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1972)
“” RCW 46.20.332. Formal testimony was received and a new order of revocation was issued following the hearing.”
Department of Motor Vehicles v. Andersen (1974)
“329 and RCW 46.20.332. The scope of such hearing for the purposes of this section shall cover the issues of whether a law enforcement officer had reasonable grounds to believe the person had been driving or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle upon the public…”
State, Department of Licensing v. Cannon (2002)
“The decision of the superior court must be in writing and filed in the clerk's office with the other papers in the case. The court shall state the reasons for the decision.”
Jose Antonio Alvarado v. State of Washington, Dept. of Licensing (2016)
“329 (copies must be disclosed within 10 business days of request).”
Post v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1973)
“329 and RCW 46.20.332. The scope of such hearing for the purposes of this section shall cover the issues of whether a law enforcement officer had reasonable grounds to believe the person had been driving or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle upon the public…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.