Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 46.65.100 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
At the expiration of seven years from the date of any final order finding a person to be an habitual offender and directing him or her not to operate a motor vehicle in this state, such person may petition the department of licensing for restoration of his or her privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this state. Upon receipt of such petition, and for good cause shown, the department of licensing shall restore to such person the privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this state upon such terms and conditions as the department of licensing may prescribe, subject to the provisions of chapter 46.29 RCW and such other provisions of law relating to the issuance or revocation of operators' licenses.
Notes:
Effective date—1998 c 214: See note following RCW 46.61.5055.
Severability—1971 ex.s. c 284: See note following RCW 46.65.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1973–2009 · leading case: State v. Malone, 511 P.2d 67 (Wash. Ct. App. 1973).
State v. Malone, 511 P.2d 67 (Wash. Ct. App. 1973). “RCW 46.65.100 reads in part: Upon receipt of such petition, and for good cause shown, the department of motor vehicles shall restore to such person the privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this state upon such terms and conditions as the department of motor vehicles may…”
State v. Anderson, 151 Wash. App. 396 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “070 and RCW 46.65.100 are concerned with the procedures for reinstatement.”
State v. Anderson, 212 P.3d 591 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “070 and RCW 46.65.100 are concerned with the procedures for reinstatement.”
State v. Danner, 900 P.2d 1126 (Wash. Ct. App. 1995). “) At the end of five years, the offender may petition for restoration pursuant to RCW 46.65.100, which states: At the expiration of five years from the date of any final order finding a person to be an habitual offender and directing him [or her] not to operate a motor vehicle…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.