Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 47.60.210 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The state consents to suits against the department by seamen for injuries occurring upon vessels of the department in accordance with the provisions of section 688, title 46, of the United States code. The venue of such actions may be in the superior court for Thurston county or the county where the injury occurred.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1961–2012 · leading case: Metz v. Washington, Dep't of Transp., 558 F. Supp. 17 (W.D. Wash. 1982).
Metz v. Washington, Dep't of Transp., 558 F. Supp. 17 (W.D. Wash. 1982). “210 provides: The state consents to suits against the authority by seamen for injuries occurring upon vessels of the authority in accordance with the provisions of section 688, title 46, of the United States code. The venue of such actions may be in the superior court for…”
Foster v. Dep't of Transp., 115 P.3d 1029 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “¶12 Foster argues that the legislature waived sovereign immunity from prejudgment interest on tort claims brought against the ferry system under RCW 47.60.210 12 or RCW 47.60.230, 13 even though it did not waive on tort claims like the one in Norris.”
Doe v. Dep't of Transp., 931 P.2d 196 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “RCW 47.60.210 permits seamen to sue the State for injuries occurring on WSDOT vessels under the provisions of the Jones Act, 46 U.”
Gross v. Washington State Ferries, 367 P.2d 600 (Wash. 1961). “(b) Laws of 1951, chapter 259, § 6 (RCW 47.60.210): “The state consents to suits against the authority by seamen for injuries occurring upon vessels of the authority in accordance with the provisions of section 688, title 46, of the United States Code.”
Harrell v. State, 170 Wash. App. 386 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “RCW 47.60.210 states, for example, in waiving sovereign immunity to Jones Act claims in state court, “The state consents to suits against the department by seamen for injuries occurring upon vessels of the department in accordance with the provisions of section 688, title 46, of…”
Dougherty v. Golden Gate Bridge, 31 F. Supp. 2d 724 (N.D. Cal. 1998). “In that case, the Ninth Circuit examined whether Washington’s adoption of the Jones Act into state law, Wash. Rev.Code § 47.60.210, constituted consent to suit in federal court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.