Wash. Rev. Code » Title 48 · Chapter 48.17
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 48.17.150 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The commissioner shall by rule establish minimum continuing education requirements for the renewal or reissuance of a license to an insurance producer.
(2) The commissioner may by rule establish minimum continuing education requirements for the renewal or reissuance of a license to a crop adjuster, an independent adjuster, and a public adjuster.
(3) The commissioner shall require that continuing education courses will be made available on a statewide basis in order to ensure that persons residing in all geographical areas of this state will have a reasonable opportunity to attend such courses.
(4) The continuing education requirements must be appropriate to the license for the lines of authority specified in RCW 48.17.170 or by rule.
[ 2021 c 22 s 2; 2010 c 67 s 5; 2009 c 162 s 17; 2007 c 117 s 10; 2005 c 223 s 7; 1994 c 131 s 4; 1988 c 248 s 9; 1979 ex.s. c 269 s 7; 1971 ex.s. c 292 s 47; 1967 c 150 s 19; 1961 c 194 s 4; 1947 c 79 s .17.15; Rem. Supp. 1947 s 45.17.15.]

Notes:

Effective date—2010 c 67: See note following RCW 48.14.010.
Effective date—2009 c 162: See note following RCW 48.03.020.
Effective date, implementation—1979 ex.s. c 269: See note following RCW 48.14.010.
Severability—1971 ex.s. c 292: See note following RCW 26.28.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2017 · leading case: Chandler v. Off. of the Ins. Comm'r, 173 P.3d 275 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Chandler v. Off. of the Ins. Comm'r, 173 P.3d 275 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “RCW 48.17.150(l)(f) and 48.17.530(l)(h) ¶34 Under RCW 48.”
Chandler v. State, Off. of Ins. Com'r, 173 P.3d 275 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “RCW 48.17.150(1)(f) and 48.17.530(1)(h) ¶ 34 Under RCW 48.”
Captain Bruce Nelson v. State Of Washington (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “And including a vague term in a statute does not necessarily render it impermissibly Vague because courts do ot analyze statutory words in isolation from the Context in which the appear.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 48.17.150(1)(f) — 1 case
Chandler v. State, Off. of Ins. Com'r, 173 P.3d 275 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “RCW 48.17.150(1)(f) and 48.17.530(1)(h) ¶ 34 Under RCW 48.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 48.17.150(1)(f)(2005) — 1 case
Captain Bruce Nelson v. State Of Washington (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “And including a vague term in a statute does not necessarily render it impermissibly Vague because courts do ot analyze statutory words in isolation from the Context in which the appear.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 48.17.150(l)(f) — 1 case
Chandler v. Off. of the Ins. Comm'r, 173 P.3d 275 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “RCW 48.17.150(l)(f) and 48.17.530(l)(h) ¶34 Under RCW 48.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.