Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.225 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) When a reasonable cause determination has been made under RCW 49.60.240 that an unfair practice in a real estate transaction has been committed and a finding has been made that the respondent has engaged in any unfair practice under RCW 49.60.250, the administrative law judge shall promptly issue an order for such relief suffered by the aggrieved person as may be appropriate, which may include actual damages as provided by the federal fair housing amendments act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 3601 et seq.), and injunctive or other equitable relief. Such order may, to further the public interest, assess a civil penalty against the respondent:
(a) In an amount up to ten thousand dollars if the respondent has not been determined to have committed any prior unfair practice in a real estate transaction;
(b) In an amount up to twenty-five thousand dollars if the respondent has been determined to have committed one other unfair practice in a real estate transaction during the five-year period ending on the date of the filing of this charge; or
(c) In an amount up to fifty thousand dollars if the respondent has been determined to have committed two or more unfair practices in a real estate transaction during the seven-year period ending on the date of the filing of this charge, for loss of the right secured by RCW 49.60.010, 49.60.030, 49.60.040, and 49.60.222 through 49.60.224, as now or hereafter amended, to be free from discrimination in real property transactions because of sex, marital status, race, creed, color, national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual orientation, families with children status, honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person who is blind, deaf, or physically disabled. Enforcement of the order and appeal therefrom by the complainant or respondent may be made as provided in RCW 49.60.260 and 49.60.270. If acts constituting the unfair practice in a real estate transaction that is the object of the charge are determined to have been committed by the same natural person who has been previously determined to have committed acts constituting an unfair practice in a real estate transaction, then the civil penalty of up to fifty thousand dollars may be imposed without regard to the period of time within which any subsequent unfair practice in a real estate transaction occurred. All civil penalties assessed under this section shall be paid into the state treasury and credited to the general fund.
(2) Such order shall not affect any contract, sale, conveyance, encumbrance, or lease consummated before the issuance of an order that involves a bona fide purchaser, encumbrancer, or tenant who does not have actual notice of the charge filed under this chapter.
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, persons awarded damages under this section may not receive additional damages pursuant to RCW 49.60.250.
[ 2020 c 52 s 17; 2007 c 187 s 16; 2006 c 4 s 17; 1997 c 271 s 17; 1995 c 259 s 4. Prior: 1993 c 510 s 20; 1993 c 69 s 9; 1985 c 185 s 19; 1979 c 127 s 11; 1973 c 141 s 14; 1969 ex.s. c 167 s 7.]

Notes:

Effective date1995 c 259: See note following RCW 49.60.010.
Severability1993 c 510: See note following RCW 49.60.010.
Severability1993 c 69: See note following RCW 49.60.030.
Severability1969 ex.s. c 167: See note following RCW 49.60.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2025 · leading case: Human Rights Comm'n v. Cheney Sch. Dist. No. 30, 641 P.2d 163 (Wash. 1982).
Human Rights Comm'n v. Cheney Sch. Dist. No. 30, 641 P.2d 163 (Wash. 1982). · cites it 4× “RCW 49.60.225 lends further legislative intent that the Legislature had not granted authority to award damages for humiliation and mental suffering for civil rights damages, by providing as follows: When a determination has been made under RCW 49.”
Rody v. Hollis, 500 P.2d 97 (Wash. 1972). · cites it 6× “In this case the Washington State Human Rights Commission is appealing from the decision of the superior court that the act of the legislature, RCW 49.60.225, authorizing an administrative tribunal appointed by the commission to award damages up to $1,000 for discrimination in…”
Kilian v. Atkinson, 50 P.3d 638 (Wash. 2002). “250 and RCW 49.60.225 at length, but stated without explanation or citation of precedent or other statute that the petitioner “who suffered damages by humiliation and mental suffering caused by age discrimination [ ] is not without a remedy.”
Skold v. Johnson, 630 P.2d 456 (Wash. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 4× “RCW 49.60.225. 3. Notify Phillip T. Johnson and Milton Jackson by registered mail, with copies to the Washington State Human Rights Commission (1601 Second Avenue Building, Fourth Floor, Seattle, Washington (98101), Attn: Compliance Review Staffperson), of the first two…”
Tafoya v. Human Rights Comm'n, 311 P.3d 70 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “But the Tafoyas rely on cases regarding the sufficiency of the evidence supporting tort claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress, which are inapplicable to sexual harassment claims.”
Voris v. Human Rights Comm'n, 704 P.2d 632 (Wash. Ct. App. 1985). “RCW 49.60.225; WAC 162-08-298(4)(n). The tribunal's imposition of the maximum allowable award [$1,000] is supported by its unchallenged finding that the Skolds' racially discriminatory practices were conscious and intentional.”
Kilian v. Atkinson, 50 P.3d 638 (Wash. 2002). “250 and RCW 49.60.225 at length, but stated without explanation or citation of precedent or other statute that the petitioner "who suffered damages by humiliation and mental suffering caused by age discrimination is not without a remedy.”
Wa State Human Rights Comm'n, Res. v. Benjamin Thomas (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “The complaint sought (1) damages for the Harmons; (2) a civil penalty of $10,000 as provided by RCW 49.60.225; (3) Thomas’ completion of fair housing training; (4) an order enjoining Thomas from discrimination, retaliation, and/or harassment of persons based on protected…”
Sara Hutchinson v. Ed Putka (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “340(6) states that in a civil action under RCW 49.60.225, a court may, in its discretion, grant reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.225(1) — 1 case
Tafoya v. Human Rights Comm'n, 311 P.3d 70 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “But the Tafoyas rely on cases regarding the sufficiency of the evidence supporting tort claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress, which are inapplicable to sexual harassment claims.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.