Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, no judicial, legislative, administrative, or other body with the power to issue a subpoena or other compulsory process may compel the news media to testify, produce, or otherwise disclose:

(a) The identity of a source of any news or information or any information that would tend to identify the source where such source has a reasonable expectation of confidentiality; or

(b) Any news or information obtained or prepared by the news media in its capacity in gathering, receiving, or processing news or information for potential communication to the public, including, but not limited to, any notes, outtakes, photographs, video or sound tapes, film, or other data of whatever sort in any medium now known or hereafter devised. This does not include physical evidence of a crime.

(2) A court may compel disclosure of the news or information described in subsection (1)(b) of this section if the court finds that the party seeking such news or information established by clear and convincing evidence:

(a)(i) In a criminal investigation or prosecution, based on information other than that information being sought, that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has occurred; or

(ii) In a civil action or proceeding, based on information other than that information being sought, that there is a prima facie cause of action; and

(b) In all matters, whether criminal or civil, that:

(i) The news or information is highly material and relevant;

(ii) The news or information is critical or necessary to the maintenance of a party's claim, defense, or proof of an issue material thereto;

(iii) The party seeking such news or information has exhausted all reasonable and available means to obtain it from alternative sources; and

(iv) There is a compelling public interest in the disclosure. A court may consider whether or not the news or information was obtained from a confidential source in evaluating the public interest in disclosure.

(3) The protection from compelled disclosure contained in subsection (1) of this section also applies to any subpoena issued to, or other compulsory process against, a nonnews media party where such subpoena or process seeks records, information, or other communications relating to business transactions between such nonnews media party and the news media for the purpose of discovering the identity of a source or obtaining news or information described in subsection (1) of this section. Whenever a subpoena is issued to, or other compulsory process is initiated against, a nonnews media party where such subpoena or process seeks information or communications on business transactions with the news media, the affected news media shall be given reasonable and timely notice of the subpoena or compulsory process before it is executed or initiated, as the case may be, and an opportunity to be heard. In the event that the subpoena to, or other compulsory process against, the nonnews media party is in connection with a criminal investigation in which the news media is the express target, and advance notice as provided in this section would pose a clear and substantial threat to the integrity of the investigation, the governmental authority shall so certify to such a threat in court and notification of the subpoena or compulsory process shall be given to the affected news media as soon thereafter as it is determined that such notification will no longer pose a clear and substantial threat to the integrity of the investigation.

(4) Publication or dissemination by the news media of news or information described in subsection (1) of this section, or a portion thereof, shall not constitute a waiver of the protection from compelled disclosure that is contained in subsection (1) of this section. In the event that the fact of publication of news or information must be proved in any proceeding, that fact and the contents of the publication may be established by judicial notice.

(5) The term "news media" means:

(a) Any newspaper, magazine or other periodical, book publisher, news agency, wire service, radio or television station or network, cable or satellite station or network, or audio or audiovisual production company, or any entity that is in the regular business of news gathering and disseminating news or information to the public by any means, including, but not limited to, print, broadcast, photographic, mechanical, internet, or electronic distribution;

(b) Any person who is or has been an employee, agent, or independent contractor of any entity listed in (a) of this subsection, who is or has been engaged in bona fide news gathering for such entity, and who obtained or prepared the news or information that is sought while serving in that capacity; or

(c) Any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of the entities listed in (a) or (b) of this subsection to the extent that the subpoena or other compulsory process seeks news or information described in subsection (1) of this section.

(6) In all matters adjudicated pursuant to this section, a court of competent jurisdiction may exercise its inherent powers to conduct all appropriate proceedings required in order to make necessary findings of fact and enter conclusions of law.

[ 2007 c 196 s 1.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2013–2023 · leading case: Repub. Of Kazakhstan v. Llc Media-consult, 368 P.3d 524 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Repub. Of Kazakhstan v. Llc Media-consult, 368 P.3d 524 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 14× “¶3 On appeal, we must interpret Washington’s news media shield law, RCW 5.68.010, and determine whether it *776 protects the information sought by this subpoena.”

United States v. Jeffrey Sterling, 724 F.3d 482 (4th Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “509]; Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 5.68.010 ; 2011 W.”

Davis v. Cox, 325 P.3d 255 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “730(3) (presumption of good faith for employer’s disclosure of employee information rebuttable only on showing of “clear and convincing evidence”); RCW 5.68.010(2) (journalist work-product may be compelled only if “the party seeking such news or information” shows its relevance…”

Green v. Pierce Cnty. (Wash. 2021). · cites it 37× “Also relevant here is the portion of RCW 5.68.010 that reads: (5) The term “news media” means: (a) Any newspaper, magazine or other periodical, book publisher, news agency, wire service, radio or television station or network, cable or satellite station or network, or audio or…”

Jeffrey Thurman v. Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich, 522 P.3d 1000 (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 15× “010, provides the news media broad protection against compelled disclosure of confidential sources of news and information and qualified protection against compelled disclosure of news and information. A subpoena and subpoena duces tecum directed to the executive editor of a…”

Wa Educ. Ass'n, V. Dept.of Ret. Sys. (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “The news media, as defined in RCW 5.68.010(5), shall have access to the photographs and full date of birth.”

Delashaw v. Seattle Times Co. (W.D. Wash. 2020). · cites it 2× “See 9 RCW 5.68.010(1)(a). Moreover, discovery into the Times’ communications with its 10 confidential sources is not proportionate to the needs of the case.”

Wa Fed'n Of State Employees, Resps V. Freedom Found., App (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “250(8) prohibits the disclosure of the month and year of birth of any public employee unless the requesting party is a member of the “news media” as defined in RCW 5.68.010(5). Slip Op. at 10-11. We ruled that RCW 42.”

The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. Newsweek Magazine LLC (S.D.N.Y. 2023). “Duin served a response to the Subpoena, objecting to the Request on the grounds that, inter alia, the Request sought information unrelated to the Article Statement and that disclosure of the information would violate the reporter’s privilege under both Washington law (RCW…”

Cortland v. Pierce Cnty. (W.D. Wash. 2020). “]” This exemption 9 does not apply to members of the news media, as defined in RCW 5.68.010(5). RCW 10 42.56.250(8). 11 Cortland’s Complaint [Dkt.”

Kent L. & Linda Davis v. Grace Cox (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “730(3) (presumption of good faith for employer's disclosure of employee information rebuttable only on showing of "clearand convincing evidence"); RCW 5.68.010(2) (journalist work-product may be compelled only if"the party seeking such news or information" shows its relevance…”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010(1) — 1 case

Repub. Of Kazakhstan v. Llc Media-consult, 368 P.3d 524 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “¶3 On appeal, we must interpret Washington’s news media shield law, RCW 5.68.010, and determine whether it *776 protects the information sought by this subpoena.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010(1)(a) — 3 cases

Jeffrey Thurman v. Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich, 522 P.3d 1000 (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “010, provides the news media broad protection against compelled disclosure of confidential sources of news and information and qualified protection against compelled disclosure of news and information. A subpoena and subpoena duces tecum directed to the executive editor of a…”

Delashaw v. Seattle Times Co. (W.D. Wash. 2020). “See 9 RCW 5.68.010(1)(a). Moreover, discovery into the Times’ communications with its 10 confidential sources is not proportionate to the needs of the case.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010(1)(b) — 1 case

— Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010(2) — 5 cases

— Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010(2)(b) — 1 case

— Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010(3) — 1 case

— Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010(5) — 5 cases

Green v. Pierce Cnty. (Wash. 2021). “Also relevant here is the portion of RCW 5.68.010 that reads: (5) The term “news media” means: (a) Any newspaper, magazine or other periodical, book publisher, news agency, wire service, radio or television station or network, cable or satellite station or network, or audio or…”

Wa Educ. Ass'n, V. Dept.of Ret. Sys. (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “The news media, as defined in RCW 5.68.010(5), shall have access to the photographs and full date of birth.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010(5)(a) — 1 case

— Wash. Rev. Code § 5.68.010(5)(b) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.