Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.220
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) For persons receiving compensation for temporary or permanent total disability pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, such compensation shall be reduced by an amount equal to the benefits payable under the federal old-age, survivors, and disability insurance act as now or hereafter amended not to exceed the amount of the reduction established pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 424a. However, such reduction shall not apply when the combined compensation provided pursuant to this chapter and the federal old-age, survivors, and disability insurance act is less than the total benefits to which the federal reduction would apply, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 424a. Where any person described in this section refuses to authorize the release of information concerning the amount of benefits payable under said federal act the department's estimate of said amount shall be deemed to be correct unless and until the actual amount is established and no adjustment shall be made for any period of time covered by any such refusal.
(2) Any reduction under subsection (1) of this section shall be effective the month following the month in which the department or self-insurer is notified by the federal social security administration that the person is receiving disability benefits under the federal old-age, survivors, and disability insurance act: PROVIDED, That in the event of an overpayment of benefits the department or self-insurer may not recover more than the overpayments for the six months immediately preceding the date the department or self-insurer notifies the worker that an overpayment has occurred: PROVIDED FURTHER, That upon determining that there has been an overpayment, the department or self-insurer shall immediately notify the person who received the overpayment that he or she shall be required to make repayment pursuant to this section and RCW 51.32.230.
(3) Recovery of any overpayment must be taken from future temporary or permanent total disability benefits or permanent partial disability benefits provided by this title. In the case of temporary or permanent total disability benefits, the recovery shall not exceed twenty-five percent of the monthly amount due from the department or self-insurer or one-sixth of the total overpayment, whichever is the lesser.
(4) No reduction may be made unless the worker receives notice of the reduction prior to the month in which the reduction is made.
(5) In no event shall the reduction reduce total benefits to less than the greater amount the worker may be entitled to under this title or the federal old-age, survivors, and disability insurance act.
(6) The director, pursuant to rules adopted in accordance with the procedures provided in the administrative procedure act, chapter 34.05 RCW, may exercise his or her discretion to waive, in whole or in part, the amount of any overpayment where the recovery would be against equity and good conscience.
(7) Subsection (1) of this section applies to:
(a) Workers under the age of sixty-two whose effective entitlement to total disability compensation begins before January 2, 1983;
(b) Workers under the age of sixty-five whose effective entitlement to total disability compensation begins after January 1, 1983; and
(c) Workers who will become sixty-five years of age on or after June 10, 2004.
(8)(a) If the federal social security administration makes a retroactive reduction in the federal social security disability benefit entitlement of a worker for periods of temporary total, temporary partial, or total permanent disability for which the department or self-insurer also reduced the worker's benefit amounts under this section, the department or self-insurer, as the case may be, shall make adjustments in the calculation of benefits and pay the additional benefits to the worker as appropriate. However, the department or self-insurer shall not make changes in the calculation or pay additional benefits unless the worker submits a written request, along with documentation satisfactory to the director of an overpayment assessment by the social security administration, to the department or self-insurer, as the case may be.
(b) Additional benefits paid under this subsection:
(i) Are paid without interest and without regard to whether the worker's claim under this title is closed; and
(ii) Do not affect the status or the date of the claim's closure.
(c) This subsection does not apply to requests on claims for which a determination on the request has been made and is not subject to further appeal.
[ 2007 c 255 s 1; 2005 c 198 s 1; 2004 c 92 s 1; 1982 c 63 s 19; 1979 ex.s. c 231 s 1; 1979 ex.s. c 151 s 1; 1977 ex.s. c 323 s 19; 1975 1st ex.s. c 286 s 3.]
Notes:
Effective dates—Implementation—1982 c 63: See note following RCW 51.32.095.
Applicability—1979 ex.s. c 231: "This 1979 act applies to all cases in which notification of the first reduction in compensation pursuant to RCW 51.32.220 is mailed after June 15, 1979, regardless of when the basis, authority, or cause for such reduction may have arisen. To such extent, this 1979 act applies retrospectively, but in all other respects it applies prospectively." [ 1979 ex.s. c 231 s 2.]
Severability—1979 ex.s. c 231: "If any provision of this 1979 act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1979 ex.s. c 231 s 3.]
Applicability—1979 ex.s. c 151: "This 1979 act applies to all cases in which notification of the first reduction in compensation pursuant to RCW 51.32.220 is mailed after May 10, 1979, regardless of when the basis, authority, or cause for such reduction may have arisen. To such extent, this 1979 act applies retrospectively, but in all other respects it applies prospectively." [ 1979 ex.s. c 151 s 3.]
Severability—1979 ex.s. c 151: "If any provision of this 1979 act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1979 ex.s. c 151 s 4.]
Severability—Effective date—1977 ex.s. c 323: See notes following RCW 51.04.040.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Ravsten v. Department of Labor & Industries
Ravsten v. Department of Labor & Industries (1987)
“When a claimant is totally and permanently disabled as defined by RCW 51.08.160 and is entitled to "receive monthly during the period of such disability" a pension under RCW 51.”
Birgen v. Department of Labor & Industries (2015)
“We agree with the Board and the superior court, and hold that RCW 51.32.220 and 42 U.S.C. § 424a(a)(8) unambiguously require that the offset for Social Security benefits be calculated using Birgen’s unadjusted 1983 income.”
Harris v. Department of Labor & Industries (1993)
“This court has upheld the validity of RCW 51.32.220, enacted originally in 1975, which reduced state workers' compensation benefits for those under 65 who were receiving federal old-age, survivors or disability benefits.”
Stuckey v. Department of Labor & Industries (1996)
“The second issue we are asked to decide is whether the Department may include social security benefits paid to an injured worker’s spouse when calculating the social security offset to the worker’s state disability pension payments, required by RCW 51.32.220. We hold RCW…”
Stuckey v. Dept. of Labor & Indus. (1996)
“The second issue we are asked to decide is whether the Department may include social security benefits paid to an injured worker's spouse when calculating the social security offset to the worker's state disability pension payments, required by RCW 51.32.220. We hold RCW…”
Frazier v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“225 uses that phrase; thus, the Department was not entitled to an offset; (2) because RCW 51.32.220 requires that the recipient receive notice of an offset a month in advance, the Department is not entitled to an offset against a payment for past amounts owing; (3) because the…”
Frazier v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“225 uses that phrase; thus, the Department was not entitled to an offset; (2) because RCW 51.32.220 requires that the recipient receive notice of an offset a month in advance, the Department is not entitled to an offset against a payment for past amounts owing; (3) because the…”
Allan v. Department of Labor & Industries (1992)
“32 RCW, such compensation shall be reduced by an amount equal to the benefits payable under the federal old-age, survivors and disability insurance act as now or hereafter amended not to exceed the amount of the reduction established pursuant to 42 USC 424a.”
Potter v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“The superior court ruled that RCW 51.32.220 does not allow the Department to make this deduction retroactively.”
Potter v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND IND. (2000)
“The superior court ruled that RCW 51.32.220 does not allow the Department to make this deduction retroactively.”
Doan v. STATE, DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES (2008)
“The trial court reversed the BIAA's decision, finding that because Doan had "not received a retroactive award of total disability benefits, or any benefits from which an offset can be taken under RCW 51.32.225, the Department did not have the authority to enter the August 26…”
Doan v. Department of Labor & Industries (2008)
“225, the Department did not have the authority to enter the August 26 order.” Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 7.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.220(1) — 16 cases
Ravsten v. Department of Labor & Industries (1987)
“When a claimant is totally and permanently disabled as defined by RCW 51.08.160 and is entitled to "receive monthly during the period of such disability" a pension under RCW 51.”
Harris v. Department of Labor & Industries (1993)
“This court has upheld the validity of RCW 51.32.220, enacted originally in 1975, which reduced state workers' compensation benefits for those under 65 who were receiving federal old-age, survivors or disability benefits.”
Potter v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“The superior court ruled that RCW 51.32.220 does not allow the Department to make this deduction retroactively.”
Potter v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND IND. (2000)
“The superior court ruled that RCW 51.32.220 does not allow the Department to make this deduction retroactively.”
Stuckey v. Department of Labor & Industries (1996)
“The second issue we are asked to decide is whether the Department may include social security benefits paid to an injured worker’s spouse when calculating the social security offset to the worker’s state disability pension payments, required by RCW 51.32.220. We hold RCW…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.220(2) — 9 cases
Frazier v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“225 uses that phrase; thus, the Department was not entitled to an offset; (2) because RCW 51.32.220 requires that the recipient receive notice of an offset a month in advance, the Department is not entitled to an offset against a payment for past amounts owing; (3) because the…”
Frazier v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“225 uses that phrase; thus, the Department was not entitled to an offset; (2) because RCW 51.32.220 requires that the recipient receive notice of an offset a month in advance, the Department is not entitled to an offset against a payment for past amounts owing; (3) because the…”
Potter v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“The superior court ruled that RCW 51.32.220 does not allow the Department to make this deduction retroactively.”
Potter v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND IND. (2000)
“The superior court ruled that RCW 51.32.220 does not allow the Department to make this deduction retroactively.”
Doan v. STATE, DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES (2008)
“The trial court reversed the BIAA's decision, finding that because Doan had "not received a retroactive award of total disability benefits, or any benefits from which an offset can be taken under RCW 51.32.225, the Department did not have the authority to enter the August 26…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.220(4) — 9 cases
Ravsten v. Department of Labor & Industries (1987)
“When a claimant is totally and permanently disabled as defined by RCW 51.08.160 and is entitled to "receive monthly during the period of such disability" a pension under RCW 51.”
Allan v. Department of Labor & Industries (1992)
“32 RCW, such compensation shall be reduced by an amount equal to the benefits payable under the federal old-age, survivors and disability insurance act as now or hereafter amended not to exceed the amount of the reduction established pursuant to 42 USC 424a.”
Frazier v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“225 uses that phrase; thus, the Department was not entitled to an offset; (2) because RCW 51.32.220 requires that the recipient receive notice of an offset a month in advance, the Department is not entitled to an offset against a payment for past amounts owing; (3) because the…”
Frazier v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“225 uses that phrase; thus, the Department was not entitled to an offset; (2) because RCW 51.32.220 requires that the recipient receive notice of an offset a month in advance, the Department is not entitled to an offset against a payment for past amounts owing; (3) because the…”
Potter v. Department of Labor & Industries (2000)
“The superior court ruled that RCW 51.32.220 does not allow the Department to make this deduction retroactively.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.220(7) — 1 case
Harris v. Department of Labor & Industries (1993)
“This court has upheld the validity of RCW 51.32.220, enacted originally in 1975, which reduced state workers' compensation benefits for those under 65 who were receiving federal old-age, survivors or disability benefits.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.220(7)(c) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.