Wash. Rev. Code § 51.44.033
Supplemental pension fund
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
There shall be, in the office of the state treasurer, a fund to be known and designated as the "supplemental pension fund." The director shall be the administrator thereof. The fund shall be used for the sole purposes of making the additional payments therefrom prescribed in this title and the loans therefrom authorized in *RCW 49.86.190.
Notes:
*Reviser's note: RCW 49.86.190 expired October 1, 2011.
Effective date—1975 1st ex.s. c 224: See note following RCW 51.04.110.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1979–2015 · leading case: National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Riveland
National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Riveland (1999)
“It provides for imposition of civil penalties recoverable by the Department of Labor and Industries for deposit into the supplemental pension fund established by RCW 51.44.033. RCW 49.17.180(8). It provides for the issuance of injunctions and temporary restraining orders to *36…”
LABOR AND INDUSTRIES v. Kennewick (1983)
“180(8) provides: "Civil penalties imposed under this chapter shall be paid to the director for deposit in the supplemental pension fund established by RCW 51.44.033. Civil penalties may be recovered in a civil action in the name of the department brought in the superior court of…”
NATIONAL ELEC. CONTRACTORS v. Riveland (1999)
“It provides for imposition of civil penalties recoverable by the Department of Labor and Industries for deposit into the supplemental pension fund established by RCW 51.44.033. RCW 49.17.180(8). It provides for the issuance of injunctions and temporary restraining orders to…”
Department of Labor & Industries v. City of Kennewick (1983)
“180(8) provides: "Civil penalties imposed under this chapter shall be paid to the director for deposit in the supplemental pension fund established by RCW 51.44.033. Civil penalties may be recovered in a civil action in the name of the department brought in the superior court of…”
Reynolds v. Insurance Co. of North America (1979)
“See RCW 51.44.033. 4 Mr. Reynolds contends that under the terms of the policy INA must pay him the same benefits he would have received under the workmen's compensation act as it existed at the time of his injury and under any subsequent amendments of the act.”
Cascadian Building Maintenance Ltd, App. v. Dept. Of Labor & Industries, St Of Wa, Resp. (2015)
“010; RCW 51.44.033. 29 RCW 51.32.090(6). A 1954 opinion from the Attorney General's office analyzed RCW 51.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.