Wash. Rev. Code » Title 6 · Chapter 6.13

Wash. Rev. Code § 6.13.020

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
If the owner is married or in a state registered domestic partnership, the homestead may consist of the community or jointly owned property of the spouses or the domestic partners or the separate property of either spouse or either domestic partner: PROVIDED, That the same premises may not be claimed separately by the spouses or domestic partners with the effect of increasing the net value of the homestead available to the marital community or state registered domestic partnership beyond the amount specified in RCW 6.13.030 as now or hereafter amended. When the owner is not married or not in a state registered domestic partnership, the homestead may consist of any of his or her property.
[ 2008 c 6 s 633; 1987 c 442 s 202; 1981 c 329 s 8; 1977 ex.s. c 98 s 1; 1973 1st ex.s. c 154 s 6; 1895 c 64 s 2; RRS s 530. Formerly RCW 6.12.020.]

Notes:

Part headings not law—Severability—2008 c 6: See RCW 26.60.900 and 26.60.901.
Severability—1981 c 329: See note following RCW 6.21.020.
Severability—1973 1st ex.s. c 154: See note following RCW 2.12.030.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2022 · leading case: In re the Bankruptcy Petition of Wieber
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re the Bankruptcy Petition of Wieber (2015) wash “64, § 2, at 109, codified as RCW 6.13.020. ¶27 In sum, the context of our homestead exemption law shows a legislative scheme that limits its application to *931 property located in Washington.”
Lester Steven Davis and Katherine Lynne Davis (2022) wawb “14 The Trustee argues that § 522(m) does not allow the Debtors to double the § 522(p)(1) 15 exemption cap because § 522(m) is limited by RCW 6.13.020, which does not allow joint 16 debtors to double their homestead exemption.”
In re Bankr. of Wieber (2015) wash “64, § 2, at 109, codified at RCW 6.13.020. In sum, the context of our homestead exemption law shows a legislative scheme that limits its application to property located in Washington.”
In re Bankr. of Wieber (2015) wash “64, § 2, at 109, codified at RCW 6.13.020. In sum, the context of our homestead exemption law shows a legislative scheme that limits its application to property located in Washington.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.