Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 6.13.160 (2026)
Sale, if not divisible
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
If, from the report, it appears to the court that the appraised value of the homestead property, less liens and encumbrances senior to the judgment being executed upon and not including the judgment being executed upon, exceeds the amount of the homestead exemption and the property is not divided, the court must make an order directing its sale under the execution. The order shall direct that at such sale no bid may be received unless it exceeds the amount of the homestead exemption.
[ 1999 c 403 s 3; 1987 c 442 s 216; 1981 c 329 s 18; 1895 c 64 s 18; RRS s 546. Formerly RCW 6.12.230.]
Notes:
Severability—1981 c 329: See note following RCW 6.21.020.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: In re Good, 588 B.R. 573 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2018).
In re Good, 588 B.R. 573 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2018). “070(1), which provides that the homestead is exempt "from execution or forced sale" up to $125,000, with certain exceptions.”
Robin L. Miller Constr. Co. v. Coltran, 87 Wash. App. 112 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “150 22 *119 and RCW 6.13.160 23 require that net value exist before a court may order the property divided or sold.”
In Re Cunningham, 163 B.R. 593 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 1994). “-080 to the total amount of taxes, interest, penalties, and costs, while RCW 6.13.160 requires that a bid for the purchase of homestead property exceed the amount of the homestead exemption.”
Robin L. Miller Const. Co. v. Coltran, 940 P.2d 661 (Wash. Ct. App. 1997). “150 [22] and RCW 6.13.160 [23] require that net value exist before a court may order the property divided or sold.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.