Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 64.34.344 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Neither the association nor any unit owner except the declarant is liable for that declarant's torts in connection with any part of the condominium which that declarant has the responsibility to maintain. Otherwise, an action alleging a wrong done by the association must be brought against the association and not against any unit owner or any officer or director of the association. Unless the wrong was done by a unit owner other than the declarant, if the wrong by the association occurred during any period of declarant control and the association gives the declarant reasonable notice of and an opportunity to defend against the action, the declarant who then controlled the association is liable to the association or to any unit owner: (1) For all tort losses not covered by insurance suffered by the association or that unit owner; and (2) for all costs which the association would not have incurred but for a breach of contract or other wrongful act or omission by the association. If the declarant does not defend the action and is determined to be liable to the association under this section, the declarant is also liable for all litigation expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the association in such defense. Any statute of limitations affecting the association's right of action under this section is tolled until the period of declarant control terminates. A unit owner is not precluded from bringing an action contemplated by this section because he or she is a unit owner or a member or officer of the association. Liens resulting from judgments against the association are governed by RCW 64.34.368.
[1989 c 43 s 3-112.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: Water's Edge Homeowners Ass'n v. Water's Edge Assocs., 216 P.3d 1110 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009).
Water's Edge Homeowners Ass'n v. Water's Edge Assocs., 216 P.3d 1110 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “2 The HOA alleged breach of implied and express warranties under the Washington Condominium Act; misrepresentations in Associates’ public offering statement; violation of Associates’ duty to provide documentation to the HOA; breach of the implied warranty of habitability; breach…”
Water's Edge Homeowners v. Water's Edge Assoc., 216 P.3d 1110 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “[2] The HOA alleged breach of implied and express warranties under the Washington Condominium Act; misrepresentations in Associates' public offering statement; violation of Associates' duty to provide documentation to the HOA; breach of the implied warranty of habitability;…”
Marina Condo. Homeowner's Ass'n v. Stratford at the Marina, LLC, 254 P.3d 827 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “86 RCW; breach of fiduciary duty; liability under RCW 64.34.344; breach of duty to repair common elements; and misrepresentation and breach of RCW 64.”
Marina Condo. Homeowners Ass'n v. Stratford, 254 P.3d 827 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “86 RCW; breach of fiduciary duty; liability under RCW 64.34.344; breach of duty to repair common elements; and misrepresentation and breach of RCW 64.”
Mdk Gen. Constr., Llc, V. Aspen Grove Owners Ass'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “For this proposition, MDK relies on RCW 64.34.344, which reads as follows: Neither the association nor any unit owner except the declarant is liable for that declarant’s torts in connection with any part of the condominium which that declarant has the responsibility to maintain.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.