Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 64.34.452 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) A judicial proceeding for breach of any obligations arising under RCW 64.34.443, 64.34.445, and 64.34.450 must be commenced within four years after the cause of action accrues: PROVIDED, That the period for commencing an action for a breach accruing pursuant to subsection (2)(b) of this section shall not expire prior to one year after termination of the period of declarant control, if any, under *RCW 64.34.308(4). Such periods may not be reduced by either oral or written agreement, or through the use of contractual claims or notice procedures that require the filing or service of any claim or notice prior to the expiration of the period specified in this section.

(2) Subject to subsection (3) of this section, a cause of action or [for] breach of warranty of quality, regardless of the purchaser's lack of knowledge of the breach, accrues:

(a) As to a unit, the date the purchaser to whom the warranty is first made enters into possession if a possessory interest was conveyed or the date of acceptance of the instrument of conveyance if a nonpossessory interest was conveyed; and

(b) As to each common element, at the latest of (i) the date the first unit in the condominium was conveyed to a bona fide purchaser, (ii) the date the common element was completed, or (iii) the date the common element was added to the condominium.

(3) If a warranty of quality explicitly extends to future performance or duration of any improvement or component of the condominium, the cause of action accrues at the time the breach is discovered or at the end of the period for which the warranty explicitly extends, whichever is earlier.

(4) If a written notice of claim is served under RCW 64.50.020 within the time prescribed for the filing of an action under this chapter, the statutes of limitation in this chapter and any applicable statutes of repose for construction-related claims are tolled until sixty days after the period of time during which the filing of an action is barred under RCW 64.50.020.

(5) Nothing in this section affects the time for filing a claim under chapter 64.35 RCW.

[ 2004 c 201 s 7; 2002 c 323 s 11; 1990 c 166 s 14.]

Notes:

*Reviser's note: RCW 64.34.308 was amended by 2011 c 189 s 2, changing subsection (4) to subsection (5), effective January 1, 2012.

Effective date—1990 c 166: See note following RCW 64.34.020.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 2003–2018 · leading case: BALLARD SQUARE Condo. v. Dynasty Constr. Co., 146 P.3d 914 (Wash. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

BALLARD SQUARE Condo. v. Dynasty Constr. Co., 146 P.3d 914 (Wash. 2006). · cites it 2× “326(1)(g), providing an affirmative defense to suits on written construction contracts if not brought within six years of substantial completion; and (3) RCW 64.34.452(1), a statute of limitations in the Washington Condominium Act.”

Ballard Square Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Dynasty Constr. Co., 158 Wash. 2d 603 (Wash. 2006). · cites it 2× “326(l)(g), providing an affirmative defense to suits on written construction contracts if not brought within six years of substantial completion; and (3) RCW 64.34.452(1), a statute of limitations in the Washington Condominium Act.”

Burien Town Square Condo. Assoc., App v. Burien Town Square Parcel 1, Llc, Resps, 416 P.3d 1286 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 9× “The period of declarant control tolled the statute of limitations contained in RCW 64.34.452. The Association timely filed its WCA claims.”

Park Avenue Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Buchan Developments, LLC, 71 P.3d 692 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “[20] Friend-of-court briefs were accepted from the Building Industry Association of Washington, and (jointly) The Housing Development Consortium of Seattle-King County (not including the Community Psychiatric Clinic), the Housing Partnership, and the Greater Seattle Chamber of…”

Park Avenue Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Buchan Developments, L.L.C., 117 Wash. App. 369 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “RCW 64.34.452(1). The four-year statute of limitations may not be shortened by either oral or written agreement.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.34.452(1) — 4 cases

BALLARD SQUARE Condo. v. Dynasty Constr. Co., 146 P.3d 914 (Wash. 2006). “326(1)(g), providing an affirmative defense to suits on written construction contracts if not brought within six years of substantial completion; and (3) RCW 64.34.452(1), a statute of limitations in the Washington Condominium Act.”

Ballard Square Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Dynasty Constr. Co., 158 Wash. 2d 603 (Wash. 2006). “326(l)(g), providing an affirmative defense to suits on written construction contracts if not brought within six years of substantial completion; and (3) RCW 64.34.452(1), a statute of limitations in the Washington Condominium Act.”

Burien Town Square Condo. Assoc., App v. Burien Town Square Parcel 1, Llc, Resps, 416 P.3d 1286 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “The period of declarant control tolled the statute of limitations contained in RCW 64.34.452. The Association timely filed its WCA claims.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.34.452(2)(b) — 1 case

— Wash. Rev. Code § 64.34.452(4) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.