Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 64.55.150 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Upon the demand of a party to an arbitration demanded under RCW 64.55.100, any subcontractor or supplier against whom such party has a legal claim and whose work or performance on the building in question becomes an issue in the arbitration may be joined in and become a party to the arbitration. However, joinder of such parties shall not be allowed if such joinder would require the arbitration hearing date to be continued beyond the date established pursuant to RCW 64.55.100, unless the existing parties to the arbitration agree otherwise. Nothing in RCW 64.55.010 through 64.55.090 shall be construed to release, modify, or otherwise alleviate the liabilities or responsibilities that any party may have towards any other party, contractor, or subcontractor.
[ 2005 c 456 s 16.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2013–2013 · leading case: Canal Station North Condo. Ass'n v. Ballard Leary Phase II, LP, 322 P.3d 1229 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013).
Canal Station North Condo. Ass'n v. Ballard Leary Phase II, LP, 322 P.3d 1229 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “100, and are not alleged or shown to be subcontractors or material suppliers who may be brought into a statutory arbitration proceeding under RCW 64.55.150. Accordingly, it is not proper to refer cases against them to arbitration.”
Canal Station Condo. Assn, Resp. v. Ballard Leary Phase Ii, Lp, Et Ano. (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “100, and are not alleged or shown to be subcontractors or material suppliers who may be brought into a statutory arbitration proceeding under RCW 64.55.150. Accordingly, it is not proper to refer cases against them to arbitration.”
Canal Station Condo. Assn, Resp. v. Ballard Leary Phase Ii, Lp, Et Ano. (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “100, and are not alleged or shown to be subcontractors or material suppliers who may be brought into a statutory arbitration proceeding under RCW 64.55.150. Accordingly, it is not proper to refer cases against them to arbitration.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.